Use the information from the two sources to answer the question.

Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of
greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have
many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their
participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the
environment.
Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that
need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to
follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be
ineffective. 
On which fact do the two sources disagree? 
(1 point)
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
5 days ago

The two sources disagree on the effectiveness and feasibility of recycling programs in schools. Source 1 emphasizes the necessity of school districts' participation for recycling to significantly impact the environment, indicating that successful programs require the involvement of many people. In contrast, Source 2 mentions the challenges of getting all students to follow a recycling program, suggesting that such programs may be ineffective despite their importance.

Thus, the correct answer is: Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.