Asked by @_@
How does judicial activism affect the court’s decisions?(1 point)
Responses
The court will determine whether there is clear violation of the Constitution and allow elected representatives to decide the outcome.
The court will determine whether there is clear violation of the Constitution and allow elected representatives to decide the outcome.
The court will exercise judicial review and refrain from deciding legal issues.
The court will exercise judicial review and refrain from deciding legal issues.
The court will allow the voting population determine if there is a constitutional issue.
The court will allow the voting population determine if there is a constitutional issue.
The court will rule on the actions of the other branches or judicial precedent.
Responses
The court will determine whether there is clear violation of the Constitution and allow elected representatives to decide the outcome.
The court will determine whether there is clear violation of the Constitution and allow elected representatives to decide the outcome.
The court will exercise judicial review and refrain from deciding legal issues.
The court will exercise judicial review and refrain from deciding legal issues.
The court will allow the voting population determine if there is a constitutional issue.
The court will allow the voting population determine if there is a constitutional issue.
The court will rule on the actions of the other branches or judicial precedent.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Judicial activism typically refers to a philosophy where courts take an active role in ensuring that justice is served and interpreting the Constitution in a way that reflects contemporary values and social needs. Therefore, the most fitting response to how judicial activism affects the court's decisions is:
**The court will rule on the actions of the other branches or judicial precedent.**
This means that judges may be more willing to overturn legislative or executive actions and set new legal precedents based on their interpretations of the law and the Constitution.
**The court will rule on the actions of the other branches or judicial precedent.**
This means that judges may be more willing to overturn legislative or executive actions and set new legal precedents based on their interpretations of the law and the Constitution.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!