Judicial activism typically refers to the practice of judges making rulings based on personal or political considerations rather than on existing law. Based on this understanding, the most accurate statement regarding how judicial activism affects the court's decisions is:
• The court will rule on the actions of the other branches or judicial precedent.
This aligns with the notion that in instances of judicial activism, courts may take a more assertive role in influencing policy and addressing perceived injustices, often interpreting the Constitution in a manner that can expand rights or counter the actions of the legislative or executive branches.