How does your approach to a subject or voice in your writing change based on whom you are speaking with? Give a specific example or two to explain.

My approach to a subject or voice in writing changes significantly depending on the audience's background, interests, and level of expertise. For instance:

1. **Academic Audience**: When writing for an academic audience, such as researchers or students in a particular field, my tone becomes more formal and technical. I would incorporate specialized terminology and cite relevant studies to support my arguments. For example, if discussing climate change, I would detail specific methodologies used in recent studies and refer to peer-reviewed journals. The voice here would be analytical, aimed at engaging a knowledgeable audience.

2. **General Public**: Conversely, if I were addressing the general public, I would adopt a more conversational and approachable tone, avoiding jargon and providing clear explanations. Using the same topic of climate change, I might focus on relatable examples — like the impact on local weather or how it affects everyday life — and use vivid imagery to make the issue more tangible. Here, the goal would be to educate and inspire action rather than to delve deeply into scientific discourse.

In summary, tailoring the voice and approach to the audience not only enhances engagement but also ensures that the message is effectively communicated.