The comparison of tone in the phrases from the two paragraphs demonstrates the contrasting attitudes of the authors toward their respective subjects.
-
The phrase "supported the ban" from "Cameras in the Courtroom" reflects a pleased tone, as it implies approval of the decision to restrict cameras, suggesting that the author values this protective measure. In contrast, the phrase "stuck in old ways" from "Challenging the Status Quo" carries a frustrated tone, indicating impatience with traditional practices and a desire for change.
-
The phrase "defendants would get nervous" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" conveys a concerned tone, highlighting a potential negative impact of cameras on defendants. Meanwhile, "a closed loop" in "Challenging the Status Quo" suggests an explanatory tone, as it describes a situation lacking openness or progression, perhaps indicating systemic issues.
-
The phrase "jurors would be distracted" reflects a scornful tone in "Cameras in the Courtroom," implying disdain for the idea that jurors might be swayed by cameras. Conversely, "Everyone should be" from "Challenging the Status Quo" can suggest an arrogant tone, as it implies a sense of superiority in advocating for change, assuming the position of knowing what is best for everyone.
-
Finally, the phrase "All these factors" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" displays an analytical tone as it points towards a thoughtful examination of various elements at play. On the other hand, "better way of functioning" in "Challenging the Status Quo" contributes to a hopeful tone, suggesting optimism about future improvements or innovations.
Each of these phrases and their associated tones help to shape the readers' perception of the topics being addressed, ultimately reflecting the authors' attitudes and the emotional weight of their arguments.
1 answer