In a paragraph, compare and contrast the arguments made by the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists at the Constitutional Convention about the benefits and problems of a strong central government.

Question

4 points

Answer 1

The Federalists, advocating for a strong central government, argued that such a structure was essential for maintaining national stability, providing for defense, regulating interstate commerce, and ensuring that individual rights would be better protected through a robust system of checks and balances. They believed that a powerful federal government could effectively manage diverse interests and prevent the chaos that arose under the Articles of Confederation. In contrast, the Anti-Federalists raised concerns about the potential tyranny of a strong central authority, fearing that it would encroach upon states’ rights and individual liberties. They argued that a decentralized government would be more accountable and better reflect the will of the people, highlighting that local issues are best addressed by local governments. While the Federalists viewed a strong central government as a means to unify and strengthen the nation, the Anti-Federalists emphasized the risks of despotism and the preservation of personal freedoms and local autonomy.