In a paragraph, compare and contrast the arguments made by the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists at the Constitutional Convention about the benefits and problems of a strong central government.

Answer 1

During the Constitutional Convention, Federalists advocated for a strong central government, arguing that it was essential for maintaining order, providing national defense, and fostering economic stability through a unified approach to governance. They believed that a robust federal structure would prevent any one faction from dominating and ensure a system of checks and balances to protect individual liberties. In contrast, Anti-Federalists raised concerns regarding the potential tyranny of a powerful central authority, fearing it would encroach on states’ rights and jeopardize personal freedoms. They argued that a strong central government could become disconnected from the needs of local populations, advocating instead for a weaker federal system that preserved greater autonomy for states. Both sides acknowledged the importance of balancing power but diverged sharply in their visions of how best to achieve a stable yet free society.