Which of the following best summarizes the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic?(1 point) Responses A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier. A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier. A single large republic will best represent and protect the interests of the states. A single large republic will best represent and protect the interests of the states. A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens. A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens. A single large republic will make controlling factions easier.
1 answer
The option that best summarizes the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic is: "A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the citizens."
Anti-Federalists were concerned that a large republic would be too distant from the people, making it challenging for elected representatives to accurately reflect the diverse interests and needs of their constituents.
18 answers
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer