Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
According to the Associative Property, which expression is equivalent to 30m+(21m−53)+(18−2m) ?(1 point) Responses (49m−53)+16...Question
According to the Associative Property, which expression is equivalent to 30m+(21m−53)+(18−2m) ?(1 point)
Responses
(49m−53)+16
left parenthesis 49 m minus 53 right parenthesis plus 16
(30m+21m)+(18−2m)
left parenthesis 30 m plus 21 m right parenthesis plus left parenthesis 18 minus 2 m right parenthesis
53m−35
53 m minus 35
51m+(−53+18)−2m
Responses
(49m−53)+16
left parenthesis 49 m minus 53 right parenthesis plus 16
(30m+21m)+(18−2m)
left parenthesis 30 m plus 21 m right parenthesis plus left parenthesis 18 minus 2 m right parenthesis
53m−35
53 m minus 35
51m+(−53+18)−2m
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine which expression is equivalent to \(30m + (21m - 53) + (18 - 2m)\) using the Associative Property, we can group the terms in different ways and simplify.
We'll break down the original expression step-by-step:
1. Rewrite the expression:
\[
30m + (21m - 53) + (18 - 2m)
\]
2. Group the first two terms \(30m\) and \(21m\):
\[
(30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m) - 53
\]
3. Calculate \(30m + 21m\):
\[
51m + (18 - 2m - 53)
\]
4. Simplify \(18 - 53\):
\[
51m - 35 - 2m
\]
5. Combine like terms:
\[
(51m - 2m) - 35 = 49m - 35
\]
From the options you provided:
1. \((49m - 53) + 16\)
2. \((30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m)\)
3. \(53m - 35\)
4. \(51m + (-53 + 18) - 2m\)
The only relevant equivalent expression we simplified is:
\[
49m - 35
\]
This does not exactly match any of the above answers without further modification.
However, the most similar form that allows for step-by-step addition:
\[
(30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m)
\]
In conclusion:
The correct option that we derived through computation is not directly listed. However, based on the simplification process used to locate the correct form using elementary algebra and the associative property, we approximate to one of the expressions provided, resulting in:
\(\text{(30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m)}\)
as we reorganized our original equation with properties encouraging interpretation.
We'll break down the original expression step-by-step:
1. Rewrite the expression:
\[
30m + (21m - 53) + (18 - 2m)
\]
2. Group the first two terms \(30m\) and \(21m\):
\[
(30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m) - 53
\]
3. Calculate \(30m + 21m\):
\[
51m + (18 - 2m - 53)
\]
4. Simplify \(18 - 53\):
\[
51m - 35 - 2m
\]
5. Combine like terms:
\[
(51m - 2m) - 35 = 49m - 35
\]
From the options you provided:
1. \((49m - 53) + 16\)
2. \((30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m)\)
3. \(53m - 35\)
4. \(51m + (-53 + 18) - 2m\)
The only relevant equivalent expression we simplified is:
\[
49m - 35
\]
This does not exactly match any of the above answers without further modification.
However, the most similar form that allows for step-by-step addition:
\[
(30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m)
\]
In conclusion:
The correct option that we derived through computation is not directly listed. However, based on the simplification process used to locate the correct form using elementary algebra and the associative property, we approximate to one of the expressions provided, resulting in:
\(\text{(30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m)}\)
as we reorganized our original equation with properties encouraging interpretation.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.