Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
Marlena solved the equation 2x + 5 = –10 – x. Her steps are shown below. 2x + 5 = –10 – x 3x + 5 = –10 3x = –15 x = –5 Use the...Asked by APPLE INNER
Marlena solved the equation 2x + 5 = –10 – x. Her steps are shown below.
2x + 5 = –10 – x
3x + 5 = –10
3x = –15
x = –5
Use the drop-down menus to justify Marlena’s work in each step of the process.
Step 1:
Step 2:
Step 3:
2x + 5 = –10 – x
3x + 5 = –10
3x = –15
x = –5
Use the drop-down menus to justify Marlena’s work in each step of the process.
Step 1:
Step 2:
Step 3:
Answers
Answered by
APPLE INNER
step 1 and 3 answers are addition property of equality or multiplication property of equality or combined like terms.
and for step 2 its either subtraction property of equality or division property of equality and combined like terms
only one answer of each step is correct
and for step 2 its either subtraction property of equality or division property of equality and combined like terms
only one answer of each step is correct
Answered by
APPLE INNER
okay wait i dont get 1 and 3
you ANSWERED 2 combined like terms but what about those 2??
the answers for step 1 that YOU MUST CHOOSE ARE addition property of equality or multiplication property of equality or combined like terms.
and FOR STEP 3 addition property of equality or multiplication property of equality or combined like terms.
you ANSWERED 2 combined like terms but what about those 2??
the answers for step 1 that YOU MUST CHOOSE ARE addition property of equality or multiplication property of equality or combined like terms.
and FOR STEP 3 addition property of equality or multiplication property of equality or combined like terms.
Answered by
APPLE INNER
STEP 2 AND STEP 3 WERE NOT CORRECT BUT WHAT IS THE ANSWER FOR 2?? ITS NOT COMBINED TERMS
Answered by
APPLE INNER
OKAY FOR THE PEOPLE WHO NEED HELP
Step 1: addition property of equality
Step 2: subtraction property of equality
Step 3: division property of equality
now What can each term of the equation be multiplied by to eliminate the fractions before solving?
x – + 2x = StartFraction one-half EndFraction x minus StartFraction 5 Over 4 EndFraction plus 2 x equals StartFraction 5 Over 6 EndFraction plus x. + x
2
6
10
12
Step 1: addition property of equality
Step 2: subtraction property of equality
Step 3: division property of equality
now What can each term of the equation be multiplied by to eliminate the fractions before solving?
x – + 2x = StartFraction one-half EndFraction x minus StartFraction 5 Over 4 EndFraction plus 2 x equals StartFraction 5 Over 6 EndFraction plus x. + x
2
6
10
12
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Here’s a justification for each step of Marlena’s work:
**Step 1:** **(Original Equation)**
Justification: **This is the original equation.**
(2x + 5 = -10 - x)
**Step 2:** **(Add x to both sides)**
Justification: **Add x to both sides to combine like terms.**
(2x + x + 5 = -10 - x + x) reduces to 3x + 5 = -10
**Step 3:** **(Subtract 5 from both sides)**
Justification: **Subtract 5 from both sides to isolate the term with x.**
(3x + 5 - 5 = -10 - 5) simplifies to 3x = -15
**Step 4:** **(Divide by 3)**
Justification: **Divide both sides by 3 to solve for x.**
(3x/3 = -15/3) results in x = -5
You can use these justifications to fill the drop-down menus as appropriate for each step of Marlena's process.
**Step 1:** **(Original Equation)**
Justification: **This is the original equation.**
(2x + 5 = -10 - x)
**Step 2:** **(Add x to both sides)**
Justification: **Add x to both sides to combine like terms.**
(2x + x + 5 = -10 - x + x) reduces to 3x + 5 = -10
**Step 3:** **(Subtract 5 from both sides)**
Justification: **Subtract 5 from both sides to isolate the term with x.**
(3x + 5 - 5 = -10 - 5) simplifies to 3x = -15
**Step 4:** **(Divide by 3)**
Justification: **Divide both sides by 3 to solve for x.**
(3x/3 = -15/3) results in x = -5
You can use these justifications to fill the drop-down menus as appropriate for each step of Marlena's process.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Thank you for the clarification! Here are the appropriate justifications based on the properties of equality:
**Step 1:**
Justification: **This is the original equation.**
**Step 2:**
Justification: **Combined like terms.**
(2x + 5 = -10 - x changes to 3x + 5 = -10)
**Step 3:**
Justification: **Subtraction property of equality.**
(3x + 5 - 5 = -10 - 5 simplifies to 3x = -15)
In this format, each step has a single justification.
**Step 1:**
Justification: **This is the original equation.**
**Step 2:**
Justification: **Combined like terms.**
(2x + 5 = -10 - x changes to 3x + 5 = -10)
**Step 3:**
Justification: **Subtraction property of equality.**
(3x + 5 - 5 = -10 - 5 simplifies to 3x = -15)
In this format, each step has a single justification.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
I apologize for the misunderstanding! Thank you for clarifying the choices for justification. Here are the correct justifications for each step based on your options:
**Step 1:**
Justification: **Addition property of equality.**
(This is because we will eventually add \( x \) to both sides in the next step.)
**Step 2:**
Justification: **Combined like terms.**
(Combining \( 2x \) and \( -x \) leads to \( 3x \).)
**Step 3:**
Justification: **Subtraction property of equality.**
(Subtracting 5 from both sides leads to \( 3x = -15 \).)
Please let me know if you need further assistance!
**Step 1:**
Justification: **Addition property of equality.**
(This is because we will eventually add \( x \) to both sides in the next step.)
**Step 2:**
Justification: **Combined like terms.**
(Combining \( 2x \) and \( -x \) leads to \( 3x \).)
**Step 3:**
Justification: **Subtraction property of equality.**
(Subtracting 5 from both sides leads to \( 3x = -15 \).)
Please let me know if you need further assistance!
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Thank you for your patience. Here’s the corrected justification for each step based on the options provided:
**Step 1:**
Justification: **Addition property of equality.**
(This is because we will eventually add \( x \) to both sides in the next step.)
**Step 2:**
Justification: **Subtraction property of equality.**
(Here, adding \( x \) to both sides results in \( 3x + 5 = -10. \))
**Step 3:**
Justification: **Subtraction property of equality.**
(Here, subtracting \( 5 \) from both sides results in \( 3x = -15. \))
So, for Step 2, the correct answer would be **Subtraction property of equality.** Thank you for pointing that out, and sorry for the confusion!
**Step 1:**
Justification: **Addition property of equality.**
(This is because we will eventually add \( x \) to both sides in the next step.)
**Step 2:**
Justification: **Subtraction property of equality.**
(Here, adding \( x \) to both sides results in \( 3x + 5 = -10. \))
**Step 3:**
Justification: **Subtraction property of equality.**
(Here, subtracting \( 5 \) from both sides results in \( 3x = -15. \))
So, for Step 2, the correct answer would be **Subtraction property of equality.** Thank you for pointing that out, and sorry for the confusion!
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To eliminate the fractions from the equation
\[
x + 2x = \frac{1}{2}x - \frac{5}{4} + 2x = \frac{5}{6} + x
\]
you need to find the least common multiple (LCM) of the denominators. The denominators present in the equation are:
- 2
- 4
- 6
The LCM of these numbers is 12. Therefore, to eliminate the fractions, you can multiply every term in the equation by 12.
Thus, the answer is **12**.
\[
x + 2x = \frac{1}{2}x - \frac{5}{4} + 2x = \frac{5}{6} + x
\]
you need to find the least common multiple (LCM) of the denominators. The denominators present in the equation are:
- 2
- 4
- 6
The LCM of these numbers is 12. Therefore, to eliminate the fractions, you can multiply every term in the equation by 12.
Thus, the answer is **12**.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.