which of the following would an archaeologist study in order to come up with the conclusion in the table

Answer 1

It seems like your question might be missing some context. If you provide the details of the conclusions in the table or any specific aspects of archaeology you want to discuss, I can give you a more accurate and helpful response. Please provide any relevant information or clarification!

Answer 2

the table says cause: use of fire
effect: allowed early humans to live in places that would have otherwise been too colf

Answer 3

To come to the conclusion that the use of fire allowed early humans to live in places that would have otherwise been too cold, an archaeologist might study several types of evidence, including:

1. Artifacts: The study of tools, hearths, and other artifacts associated with fire usage can provide insights into how early humans managed and utilized fire.

2. Fire remains: Analysis of charcoal, ash, and soot found in archaeological sites can indicate where fire was used, how often it was utilized, and what types of materials were burned. This could shed light on the control and purpose of fire in their daily lives.

3. Settlement patterns: Investigating the locations of early human settlements can reveal correlations between the use of fire and habitation in colder regions. Archaeologists can examine the geographical distribution of sites to understand where early humans lived in relation to available resources and climate.

4. Paleoenvironmental data: Looking at environmental evidence, such as pollen analysis or climate indicators, can help reconstruct past climates and show how fire usage may have aided survival in specific conditions.

5. Comparative studies: Examining modern hunter-gatherer societies that utilize fire can provide context for understanding its role in enabling survival in harsh environments.

6. Biological studies: Investigating the impact of fire on early human diets (cooking food) and health, including how cooked food could allow early humans to thrive in colder climates due to improved nutrition and safety.

By integrating these various sources of evidence, an archaeologist could draw conclusions about the critical role of fire in the lives of early humans, particularly regarding their adaptation to colder climates.

Answer 4

the answers are
1. the diary entries from early humans
2. the artifacts that early humans left behind
3. the oral traditions that early humans passed down
4. the fossilized bones of animals in the same area

Answer 5

To determine which of the provided options an archaeologist would study to conclude that the use of fire allowed early humans to live in places that would have otherwise been too cold, let’s evaluate each option:

1. The diary entries from early humans: This option is not applicable, as early humans did not keep written records or diary entries.

2. The artifacts that early humans left behind: This is the most relevant option. Artifacts, particularly those related to fire use (like hearths or tools for starting fires), would provide direct evidence of fire usage and its importance for survival in colder environments.

3. The oral traditions that early humans passed down: While oral traditions can provide valuable insights into human history and culture, they would not be directly studied by archaeologists in the same way as physical evidence. Nonetheless, they may contain contextual information about fire usage if they were available.

4. The fossilized bones of animals in the same area: While studying fossilized bones can provide information about the types of animals present and may indicate what early humans hunted, it wouldn’t directly inform conclusions about fire use.

Given the options, the correct answer would be:

2. the artifacts that early humans left behind.

This would provide tangible evidence to support the conclusion regarding the use of fire and its effects on habitation patterns in cold environments.