Question
Imagine that you are writing an argument for mandatory year-round school nationwide. Which claim is most effective and precise?
Most students are against coming to school in the summer.
We have never had year-round school before, so it will not work.
More frequent breaks are beneficial for students and teachers alike.
I am against year-round school because I do not like it.
Most students are against coming to school in the summer.
We have never had year-round school before, so it will not work.
More frequent breaks are beneficial for students and teachers alike.
I am against year-round school because I do not like it.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The most effective and precise claim for an argument in favor of mandatory year-round school nationwide is: **"More frequent breaks are beneficial for students and teachers alike."**
This claim is effective because it presents a clear, positive argument supported by evidence about the benefits of year-round schooling, such as improved retention of knowledge, reduced burnout, and increased opportunities for enrichment. It also addresses the needs of both students and teachers, making it a comprehensive argument.
This claim is effective because it presents a clear, positive argument supported by evidence about the benefits of year-round schooling, such as improved retention of knowledge, reduced burnout, and increased opportunities for enrichment. It also addresses the needs of both students and teachers, making it a comprehensive argument.