1 through 7 and 14 are correct.
8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15 are incorrect.
You don't seem to understand the testimonial tactic very well.
Three of the questions you got wrong used the testimonial tactic.
Look at number 9. Isn't that an attack tactic -- calling Justice Marshall names?
Mrs Sue do you mind checking my answers for me please? I have been working on this assignment for several days.
The following activity helps you
sharpen your skills in recognizing deceptive reasoning. The statements below are derived from the viewpoints in this chapter. Beside each one, mark the letter of the type of deceptive appeal being used. More than one type of tactic may be applicable. If you believe the statement is not any of the listed appeals, write N.
.
1. The Supreme Court has a greater obligation to protect the rights of victims than those of criminals.- (B) Categorical Statements
2. It is clear to every intelligent person that the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, protection against cruel and unusual punishment, does not bar the use of victim impact statements – (A) Bandwagon
3. Victim reforms will destroy the constitutional rights of the accused.- (B) Categorical Statements
4. The conservative, prejudiced Supreme Court judges are too stupid to recognize the rights of the accused. - (C) Personal Attack
5. Every decent lawyer believes the harm a victim suffered because of a defendant should be considered when determining punishment.- (B) Categorical Statements
.
6. Victims have absolutely no rights at all.- (B) Categorical Statements
7. Everyone agrees that victim reforms are false promises made by legislators seeking to please voters worried about crime seeking to please voters worried about crime- (C) Personal Attack– (A) Bandwagon
8. The victims’ rights movement developed because victims of crime felt they had no rights in the criminal justice system.- (D) Testimonial
9. Thurgood Marshall, a pro-criminal, bleeding-heart liberal, considers the harm a victim suffered irrelevant in a criminal trial.- (B) Categorical Statements
10. As Justice John Paul Stevens correctly points out, the defendant should have more rights than the state in a criminal trial.- (B) Categorical Statements ( might be bandwagon)
11. Victim impact statements force juries to base their decisions on emotion rather than on objective facts. .- (D) Testimonial
12. As Deborah Kelly, chair of the American Bar Association’s Victims’ Committee, accurately concludes, victims’ satisfaction with the criminal justice system depends more on how they were treated than how severely their
Assailants were punished. .- (B) Categorical Statements
13. Everyone knows that judges let criminals off too easily. .- (B) Categorical Statements
14. Intelligent people agree that victims’ rights deny the accused the rights to a fair and impartial trial. – (A) Bandwagon
15. As the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, William H Rehnquist, states there is no constitutional rule that exclude victim impact statements. – (A) Bandwagon
These were my choices that I had to pick from.
A. Bandwagon - The idea that everybody does this or believes this doing something because everyone else does.
B. Categorical Statements-stating something in a way that implies there can be no argument or disagreement on the issue if this is true/ then the other is not or if this is not true, the other is true.
C. Personal Attack- criticizing an opponent personally instead of rationally debating his or her ideas.
D. Testimonial –quoting or paraphrasing an authority or celebrity to support one’s own viewpoint.
Thank you for your assistance.
Dave.
3 answers
Hi Sue, how can i research each of these question in on the internet, using the most efficent way. I learn diffrently and my deceptive reasoning is weak in this area. if i know the ansswer,i can learn where how it originated, thanks
d. testimonial—quoting or paraphrasing an authority or celebrity to support
one’s own viewpoint for #10
one’s own viewpoint for #10
1 answer