Asked by lola

How did Wisconsin violate the Free Exercise Clause in Wisconsin v. Yoder?(1 point)
Responses

Wisconsin made a law banning incendiary speech against certain religious groups.
Wisconsin made a law banning incendiary speech against certain religious groups.

Wisconsin made a law establishing limits on Amish practices outside of the community.
Wisconsin made a law establishing limits on Amish practices outside of the community.

Wisconsin made a law forcing children to go to public schools instead of receiving a private education.
Wisconsin made a law forcing children to go to public schools instead of receiving a private education.

Wisconsin made a law allowing the use of religious dress while serving in the military.
Answered by lola
How does the Compulsory Process Clause apply to the Sixth Amendment?(1 point)
Responses

It defends the rights of citizens in court by requiring witnesses to testify in front of the accused.
It defends the rights of citizens in court by requiring witnesses to testify in front of the accused.

It defends the rights of citizens in court by allowing them to obtain and subpoena witnesses.
It defends the rights of citizens in court by allowing them to obtain and subpoena witnesses.

It protects citizens from false legal accusations.
It protects citizens from false legal accusations.

It maintains the rights of citizens by ensuring they have access to free legal advice
Answered by lola
Which of the following is the Fifth Amendment right that was violated in Chambers v. Florida (1940)?(1 point)
Responses

the defendants’ right to due process
the defendants’ right to due process

the defendants’ right to an attorney
the defendants’ right to an attorney

the defendants’ right to remain silent
the defendants’ right to remain silent

the defendants’ right to a phone call
Answered by lola
The Supreme Court case of Carey v. Musladin involved a murder case in which the family of the victims wore buttons with images of the victim to the trial. What Sixth Amendment protection was in question in Carey v. Musladin?(1 point)
Responses

right to be informed of charges
right to be informed of charges

right to cross-examine the individuals wearing buttons
right to cross-examine the individuals wearing buttons

right to an impartial jury
right to an impartial jury

right to public trial
Answered by lola
What is the difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion?(1 point)
Responses

A search warrant can only be issued with reasonable suspicion.
A search warrant can only be issued with reasonable suspicion.

With probable cause, there is actual knowledge that a crime has been committed; with reasonable suspicion, there is not actual knowledge.
With probable cause, there is actual knowledge that a crime has been committed; with reasonable suspicion, there is not actual knowledge.

Reasonable suspicion is actual knowledge that a crime has been committed, and probable cause means that a crime has probably been committed.
Reasonable suspicion is actual knowledge that a crime has been committed, and probable cause means that a crime has probably been committed.

Probable cause is the level of evidence schools need, but police need to have reasonable suspicion.
Answered by lola
Which case found that minors could not be sentenced to mandatory life without the possibility of parole for homicide?(1 point)
Responses

Atkins v. Virginia
Atkins v. Virginia

Graham v. Florida
Graham v. Florida

Miller v. Alabama
Miller v. Alabama

Coker v. Georgia
Answered by GPT 3.5
Wisconsin made a law forcing children to go to public schools instead of receiving a private education.
Answered by GPT 3.5
It defends the rights of citizens in court by allowing them to obtain and subpoena witnesses.
Answered by GPT 3.5
the defendants’ right to due process
Answered by GPT 3.5
right to an impartial jury
Answered by GPT 3.5
With probable cause, there is actual knowledge that a crime has been committed; with reasonable suspicion, there is not actual knowledge.
Answered by GPT 3.5
Miller v. Alabama