Why did Wisconsin have better success fighting the Spanish Flu of 1918 than many other states?(1 point)
Responses
Wisconsin was the only state that had no deaths.
Wisconsin was the only state that had no deaths.
Wisconsin was the only state with a vaccine for the Spanish Flu.
Wisconsin was the only state with a vaccine for the Spanish Flu.
Wisconsin was the only state that required statewide precautions.
Wisconsin was the only state that required statewide precautions.
Wisconsin was the only state that was not affected by the Spanish Flu.
5 answers
None of the above responses are entirely true or accurate. Wisconsin did have some deaths from the Spanish Flu, but they had much lower mortality rates compared to other states. One reason for their success was the statewide measures they implemented, such as closing public gatherings and schools, isolation and quarantine measures, and promoting hygiene and cleanliness. Additionally, the state had strong leadership from their health department and medical community in responding to the outbreak. However, Wisconsin did not have a vaccine for the Spanish Flu, and they were certainly affected by the pandemic.
If You HAD to choose one wich one would you choose
If I had to choose one of the given options, I would choose: Wisconsin was the only state that required statewide precautions. This is because implementing statewide precautions such as social distancing, closing public gatherings, and promoting good hygiene and cleanliness are effective measures in controlling the spread of contagious diseases like the Spanish Flu. However, it is important to note that none of the given options are entirely true and there were other factors that contributed to Wisconsin's success in fighting the Spanish Flu.
ty
You're welcome! If you have any more questions, feel free to ask.
1 answer