Question
I am having a great deal of difficulty with this problem.
An open box is formed by cutting squares out of a piece of cardboard that is 16 ft by 19 ft and folding up the flaps.
a. what size corner squares should be cut to yield a box that has a volume of 175 cubic feet.
So I have this equation
x(16-2x)(19-2x)= 175
multiplied both parenthesis and got
4x^2-70x+304
multiplied the entire thing by x
4x^3-70x^2+304x=175
subtract 175
4x^3-70x^2+304x-175=0
I'm not sure what to do next. I was thinking rational root theorem but I have tried most of the roots and it hasn't worked. I am not sure how to solve something to the third power.
Thanks
An open box is formed by cutting squares out of a piece of cardboard that is 16 ft by 19 ft and folding up the flaps.
a. what size corner squares should be cut to yield a box that has a volume of 175 cubic feet.
So I have this equation
x(16-2x)(19-2x)= 175
multiplied both parenthesis and got
4x^2-70x+304
multiplied the entire thing by x
4x^3-70x^2+304x=175
subtract 175
4x^3-70x^2+304x-175=0
I'm not sure what to do next. I was thinking rational root theorem but I have tried most of the roots and it hasn't worked. I am not sure how to solve something to the third power.
Thanks
Answers
bobpursley
I graphed y=4x^3-70x^2+304x-175. Perhaps that would help. I think there are a couple of solutions.
Is there a mathematical way to solve this without using the graphing calculator?
A graphical solution is already a mathematical solution. In fact, the graphical solution gives three real roots, namely near x=1, x=6 and x=11.
On the basis that 2*11>16, 11 cannot be retained as a valid solution.
So the remaining real solutions are around 1 and 6.
If you are looking for an analytical way to solve the cubic, there is the Nicolo Fontana Tartaglia method which is described in detail in:
http://www.sosmath.com/algebra/factor/fac11/fac11.html
The solution consists of three steps:
1. Find the depressed equation
by removing the x² term of the general cubic by substitution, i.e.
in f(x)=Ax³+bx²+cx+d
substitute x=y-b/(3a) to give
f(y)=a*y^3 + (c-(b^2)/(3*a))*y + d-(b*c)/(3*a)+(2*b^3)/(27*a^2)
Note the absence of the y² term.
We will denote the depressed equation as
y³+Ay=B
2. Find s and t such that
3st=A
s²-t³=B
then a real solution of the cubic is
y=s-t from which x can be found.
3. Using long division, reduce the cubic to a quadratic and find the two remaining solutions.
Give it a try and the three (real) roots should be around 1, 6 and 11.
On the basis that 2*11>16, 11 cannot be retained as a valid solution.
So the remaining real solutions are around 1 and 6.
If you are looking for an analytical way to solve the cubic, there is the Nicolo Fontana Tartaglia method which is described in detail in:
http://www.sosmath.com/algebra/factor/fac11/fac11.html
The solution consists of three steps:
1. Find the depressed equation
by removing the x² term of the general cubic by substitution, i.e.
in f(x)=Ax³+bx²+cx+d
substitute x=y-b/(3a) to give
f(y)=a*y^3 + (c-(b^2)/(3*a))*y + d-(b*c)/(3*a)+(2*b^3)/(27*a^2)
Note the absence of the y² term.
We will denote the depressed equation as
y³+Ay=B
2. Find s and t such that
3st=A
s²-t³=B
then a real solution of the cubic is
y=s-t from which x can be found.
3. Using long division, reduce the cubic to a quadratic and find the two remaining solutions.
Give it a try and the three (real) roots should be around 1, 6 and 11.
Related Questions
Hello.
I am having difficulty with this problem for calc. could you please help?
A net enclosure for...
What was the name of the agreement between small and large states that provided proportional represe...
What was the name of the agreement between small and large states that provided proportional represe...
Which statement about the New Deal is true?
All the rural poor thrived because of the New Deal....