Question

Use the arguments about the effects of video games on teenagers to answer the question.



Argument 1: Video games are fun, but they make teenagers less likely to engage in physical exercise.

Argument 2: Video games help teach teenagers to perform more than one task at the same time.



On which point do these two arguments disagree?

(1 point)
Responses

whether or not video games are a good substitute for exercise
whether or not video games are a good substitute for exercise

whether or not video games make teenagers more passive
whether or not video games make teenagers more passive

whether or not video games are fun for teenagers to play
whether or not video games are fun for teenagers to play

whether or not video games have any benefits for teenagers

Answer 1

that is not an answer

Answer 2

The two arguments disagree on whether or not video games are a good substitute for exercise. Argument 1 suggests that video games make teenagers less likely to engage in physical exercise, while Argument 2 implies that video games help teach teenagers to perform more than one task at the same time, which suggests that they may be considered a form of mental exercise or stimulation.

Answer 3

I apologize for the confusion. The correct answer is whether or not video games are a good substitute for exercise. Argument 1 implies that video games discourage physical exercise, suggesting that they are not a good substitute for exercise. On the other hand, Argument 2 suggests that video games have benefits in teaching teenagers to perform multiple tasks at once, implying that they may be a suitable alternative or addition to traditional forms of exercise.