Consider these two arguments about immigration.
In a well-structured paragraph, compare the rhetorical devices used by President Obama and President Trump.
1 answer
Both President Obama and President Trump utilize different rhetorical devices to convey their arguments about immigration. President Obama often employs pathos to appeal to the emotions of his audience and create a sense of empathy. He frequently tells personal stories of immigrants, highlighting their struggles and contributions to society. This use of anecdotes and emotional appeals aims to generate support for more inclusive and compassionate immigration policies. In contrast, President Trump predominantly uses ethos and logos to emphasize the importance of national security and economic concerns. He often relies on statistics and logical reasoning to argue for stricter immigration controls, focusing on the potential risks and costs associated with unregulated immigration. Trump's frequent repetition of phrases such as "America First" and "build the wall" is also a rhetorical device, aiming to reinforce his message and rally his base. Overall, while both presidents utilize rhetorical devices to influence public opinion, they differ in their choice of appeals and approaches to the subject of immigration.
1 answer