Question

Which of the following cases from the U.S. Supreme Court provides that state courts may exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant who has “certain minimum contacts with [the State] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend 'traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice'”?

Ex parte McCardle

International Shoe Co. v. Washington

Claflin v. Houseman

Marbury v. Madison

Answer 1

The case that provides that state courts may exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant who has "certain minimum contacts with [the State] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend 'traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice'" is International Shoe Co. v. Washington.