Question 1
To determine the argument that best supports the idea that further biotechnological advancements in food sciences is beneficial for society, we can evaluate each option:
a) This argument states that biotechnology can make plants immune to various bacteria, but it also mentions that the antibacterial compounds can affect people who consume the plant. Therefore, this argument does not strongly support the idea of further advancements.
b) This argument discusses how biotechnology has created plant varieties that are herbicide-resistant and pest-resistant, which make up most of the market. However, it also mentions that this reduces the number of plant varieties people plant on the landscape. This argument does not strongly support the idea of further advancements.
c) This argument highlights the fact that biotechnological advancements have reduced the cost and resources needed for many different food products, allowing people to produce more in a shorter amount of time. This demonstrates a clear benefit for society. Therefore, this argument strongly supports the idea of further advancements.
d) This argument mentions the reduced need for large-scale farms and traditional farming due to crops developed through biotechnological engineering. While this does have potential benefits, it does not directly address the advancements in food sciences. Therefore, this argument does not strongly support the idea of further advancements.
Based on these evaluations, option c (Biotechnology is responsible for advancements that reduce the cost and resources needed for many different food products and allows people to produce more in a shorter amount of time) is the argument that best supports the idea that further biotechnological advancements in food sciences are beneficial for society.
To determine the answer, evaluate each option by considering the potential benefits and drawbacks of further biotechnological advancements.