Question
But just because scientists may be able to bring species back doesn’t mean they should. Two scientists debate the ethics of de-extinction.
Examine the author's word choice at the end of section #1. Which position does the author seem to show bias toward? In other words, which position does the author seem to agree with?(1 point)
Responses
We should bring back extinct species.
We should bring back extinct species.
We should not bring back extinct species.
Examine the author's word choice at the end of section #1. Which position does the author seem to show bias toward? In other words, which position does the author seem to agree with?(1 point)
Responses
We should bring back extinct species.
We should bring back extinct species.
We should not bring back extinct species.
Answers
Answer
can you explain why
Answered by
GPT 3.5
We should not bring back extinct species.
Answered by
GPT 3.5
The author's word choice at the end of section #1 ("doesn't mean they should") implies a cautionary position or hesitation towards the idea of bringing back extinct species. This suggests that the author is more inclined to agree with the position that we should not bring back extinct species. The use of the word "should not" instead of "should" indicates the author's bias against de-extinction.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.