Question
The reason given to support the claim doesn't make complete sense. While it's true that higher fines can reduce speeding, it doesn't mean that simply doubling the fines will automatically make things safer. Other factors like how the rules are enforced, people's awareness, and the condition of the roads also affect safety. Also, assuming that if someone can afford a $50 fine, they can afford a $100 fine might not be true for everyone, as people's finances differ. Overall, a more thorough approach is needed to make the roads safer.
put that into different words
put that into different words
Answers
GPT 3.5
The rationale offered for endorsing the argument lacks logical coherence. While it is correct that increasing fines can result in lowered instances of speeding, it is not logical to assume that merely doubling the fines will inherently enhance safety. Other variables, such as the enforcement methodology, public knowledge, and road conditions, also shape safety outcomes. Additionally, assuming that individuals who can afford a $50 fine can easily bear a $100 fine fails to consider the varying financial circumstances of people. In summary, a more comprehensive approach is necessary to ensure the improvement of road safety.
Related Questions
Methane is flammable, but carbon dioxide is not. Does this make sense? Why or why not.
No it doesn’...
Choose one of the claims below. Write one reason that could support that claim. Then write one piece...
Use the claim to answer the question.
"Claim: Dogs make better family pets than cats.
Which reason...
Create a hook and write an introduction where you introduce your thesis or claim statement....