Asked by Sean
How can I prove that sqrt(x) > ln x when x > 0?
I can quickly see this graphically and intuitively, but how do I do a proof?
I can quickly see this graphically and intuitively, but how do I do a proof?
Answers
Answered by
Reiny
How about an argument like this:
the first derivatives of √x and lnx are
1/(2√x) and 1/x respectively.
Neither curve has any max/min points or points of inflection, so they are both increasing all the time
y = √x is clearly greater than y = lnx for 0 < x ≤ 1
(√(a decimal) is positive, ln(decimal less than 1) is negative)
since √x starts off by being above lnx and since both increase , √x stays above lnx , thus √x > lnx
you might want to include the second derivative test
the second derivatives are -1/(4x^(3/2)) and -1/x^2 respectively.
they are both slowing up, but continue to increase, but since x^2 > x^(3/2) for all x > 1 the lnx function is slowing up faster than the square roots function.
Thus the difference between the function actually gets larger and clearly √x > ln x
the first derivatives of √x and lnx are
1/(2√x) and 1/x respectively.
Neither curve has any max/min points or points of inflection, so they are both increasing all the time
y = √x is clearly greater than y = lnx for 0 < x ≤ 1
(√(a decimal) is positive, ln(decimal less than 1) is negative)
since √x starts off by being above lnx and since both increase , √x stays above lnx , thus √x > lnx
you might want to include the second derivative test
the second derivatives are -1/(4x^(3/2)) and -1/x^2 respectively.
they are both slowing up, but continue to increase, but since x^2 > x^(3/2) for all x > 1 the lnx function is slowing up faster than the square roots function.
Thus the difference between the function actually gets larger and clearly √x > ln x
Answered by
Sean
That works. Thanks so much!
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.