Hi ya!

So I got a question like when I'm rationalzing a denomenator in order to get simple radical form I really don't know what to do

for example this problem

(6^(2^-1)-3^(2^-1))^-1

ok so I know your trying to get it so it's a perfect sqaure right so I can legally write this

(6^(2^-1)-3^(2^-1))^-1 A = (6 - 3)^-1 = 3^-1

or a simplified formula

(6^(2^-1)-3^(2^-1))^-1 A = 3^-1
and solve for A were A equals the value needed to get the perfect square 6-3 or simply 3 right so I solved

A=3^-1(6^(2^-1)-3^(2^-1))

and I get some value which is equal to
(6^(2^-1)+3^(2^-1))^-1
but where s the proof that this is correct using that formula all you get is some number and I have no idea how you get this answer I know you just make the negetive positive but what allows you to do that?????

1 answer

You still haven't read about conjugates. You are NOT trying to get a perfect square, you are trying to get a difference of perfect squares.
http://www.regentsprep.org/Regents/math/algtrig/ATO3/rdlesson.htm
Similar Questions
  1. y = (x^2 -4)/(x^2 - x -12)dy/dx of numerator I got 2x dy/dx of denomenator I got 2x - 1 dy/dx of y I got (x^2 - 16x
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Assume that no denomenator equals 0.(7x^2+3x-9)-(-x^2+8x-3) = 7x^2+3x-9+x^2-8x+3 = (7x^2+x^2)+(3x-8x)+(-9+3) = 8x^2+-5x+-6 =
    1. answers icon 4 answers
  3. Simpilfy the radical expression by rationalzing the denoiminator?3/sqrt15 a)sqrt45/15 b)sqrt15/5 c)5sqrt15*** d)sqrt3
    1. answers icon 3 answers
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions