Asked by Andre
I don't understand this question:
the removal of general mcclellan represents a loss of the army and the potomac and a victory for the interfering politicans in washington
(validate)
i know that mcclellan was replaced by grant because he was to hesitant to attack. but i don't understand this quesiton at all. i tried for an hour to try to understand it please help!
the removal of general mcclellan represents a loss of the army and the potomac and a victory for the interfering politicans in washington
(validate)
i know that mcclellan was replaced by grant because he was to hesitant to attack. but i don't understand this quesiton at all. i tried for an hour to try to understand it please help!
Answers
Answered by
Ms. Sue
You're being asked to support the statement that McClellan's removal was a loss to the army and the Army of the Potomac. His removal was caused by the politicians. The implication is that a general in the field knew better how to fight a war than desk jockeys in Washington.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_B._McClellan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_B._McClellan
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.