Question
find the midpoint of the two points
(0,8) and (-5.0
(0,8) and (-5.0
Answers
GPT 3.5
To find the midpoint of two points, add the x-coordinates and divide by 2 to get the midpoint's x-coordinate. Then, add the y-coordinates and divide by 2 to get the midpoint's y-coordinate.
For the points (0,8) and (-5,0), the x-coordinates are 0 and -5, and the y-coordinates are 8 and 0.
Midpoint's x-coordinate = (0 + -5) / 2 = -5/2 = -2.5
Midpoint's y-coordinate = (8 + 0) / 2 = 8/2 = 4
Therefore, the midpoint of the two points is (-2.5,4).
For the points (0,8) and (-5,0), the x-coordinates are 0 and -5, and the y-coordinates are 8 and 0.
Midpoint's x-coordinate = (0 + -5) / 2 = -5/2 = -2.5
Midpoint's y-coordinate = (8 + 0) / 2 = 8/2 = 4
Therefore, the midpoint of the two points is (-2.5,4).
Arizona’s 2010 law enforced
the state’s right to encourage immigration.
the state’s right to encourage immigration.
the state’s right to restrict number of sanctuary cities.
the state’s right to restrict number of sanctuary cities.
the state’s right to limit number of immigrating entering. the state’s right to limit number of immigrating entering. the state’s right to determine the immigration status of all individuals.
the state’s right to determine the immigration status of all individuals. the state’s right to restrict unauthorized immigrants from attending public schools.
the state’s right to encourage immigration.
the state’s right to encourage immigration.
the state’s right to restrict number of sanctuary cities.
the state’s right to restrict number of sanctuary cities.
the state’s right to limit number of immigrating entering. the state’s right to limit number of immigrating entering. the state’s right to determine the immigration status of all individuals.
the state’s right to determine the immigration status of all individuals. the state’s right to restrict unauthorized immigrants from attending public schools.
GPT-4
Arizona's 2010 law enforced the state’s right to determine the immigration status of all individuals, amid other measures. Known as SB 1070, it is considered one of the strictest anti-illegal immigration measures in recent US history. The law however does not restrict unauthorized immigrants from attending public schools, as that would be in violation of the 1982 Supreme Court ruling in Plyler v. Doe which determined that all children are entitled to a public education, regardless of their immigration status.
Correct interpretation of your entries could be:
- The law enforced the state's right to limit the number of immigrants entering (though it is mostly federal jurisdiction that determines immigration quotas)
- It aimed to restrict the number of sanctuary cities (cities that limit their cooperation with the national government's immigration law enforcement to protect immigrants)
- The law however had its more controversial provision that allows law enforcement officers to determine an individual's immigration status during a lawful stop, detention, or arrest if there is a reasonable suspicion that the individual is an illegal immigrant. This provision was partially upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012, but it also held that it would be constitutional if it didn’t result in prolonged detention.
It's important to note that many aspects of this law have been subject to legal challenge and debate due to concerns about racial profiling, human rights, and the balance of power between state and federal government, among others. Despite these challenges, parts of the law remain in effect.
Correct interpretation of your entries could be:
- The law enforced the state's right to limit the number of immigrants entering (though it is mostly federal jurisdiction that determines immigration quotas)
- It aimed to restrict the number of sanctuary cities (cities that limit their cooperation with the national government's immigration law enforcement to protect immigrants)
- The law however had its more controversial provision that allows law enforcement officers to determine an individual's immigration status during a lawful stop, detention, or arrest if there is a reasonable suspicion that the individual is an illegal immigrant. This provision was partially upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012, but it also held that it would be constitutional if it didn’t result in prolonged detention.
It's important to note that many aspects of this law have been subject to legal challenge and debate due to concerns about racial profiling, human rights, and the balance of power between state and federal government, among others. Despite these challenges, parts of the law remain in effect.
True or false: Stephen Crane was a Civil War veteran.
true
false
true
false
GPT-4
False
How old was Stephen Crane when he died?
(1 point)
Responses
48
48
35
35
28
(1 point)
Responses
48
48
35
35
28
GPT-4
28
Choose the adjective that could best describe the literary style of The Red Badge of Courage.
(1 point)
Responses
romantic
romantic
realistic
realistic
humorous
(1 point)
Responses
romantic
romantic
realistic
realistic
humorous
GPT-4
realistic