Asked by Mike
I was writing something out and someone said that 'You can win special armor!' as a line is incorrect. They stated that it should have an article, aka 'You can win a special armor!'
To me, both in this case are correct. I know you can't 'win special weapon', and the article would be removed only when it's a plural in this case, aka 'win a special weapon'/'win special weapons'.
If the above 'win special armor' is correct, why is that? Is there a rule or logic to why that works in this case and sounds correct?
To me, both in this case are correct. I know you can't 'win special weapon', and the article would be removed only when it's a plural in this case, aka 'win a special weapon'/'win special weapons'.
If the above 'win special armor' is correct, why is that? Is there a rule or logic to why that works in this case and sounds correct?
Answers
Answered by
Writeacher
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/armor
Notice that <i>armor</i> is an uncountable or non-count noun. It's like <i>scissors, flour, bread, tea, milk,</i> and other nouns that do not have countable elements. Therefore none of the adjectives or articles that indicate a number are to be used with this noun.
Now … if the phrase had been "a suit of armor" …
(These are "count" nouns: cup, dish, child, house, tractor …
You can actually count them!)
Notice that <i>armor</i> is an uncountable or non-count noun. It's like <i>scissors, flour, bread, tea, milk,</i> and other nouns that do not have countable elements. Therefore none of the adjectives or articles that indicate a number are to be used with this noun.
Now … if the phrase had been "a suit of armor" …
(These are "count" nouns: cup, dish, child, house, tractor …
You can actually count them!)
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.