Asked by Ashley
How do we show that for all x>0 , that x + ln(1+x) > (x^2/(2(1+x))) ?
I differentiated the function w.r.t x and got f'(x) =((x+2)^2)/(2(1+x)) , and for x>0, f'(x)>0.
Does this prove what's required?
I differentiated the function w.r.t x and got f'(x) =((x+2)^2)/(2(1+x)) , and for x>0, f'(x)>0.
Does this prove what's required?
Answers
Answered by
Reiny
x + ln(1+x) > (x^2/(2(1+x)))
or ln(1+x) > x^2/(2+2x) - x
ln(1+x) > (x^2 - 2x - 2x^2)/(2+2x)
ln(1+x) > (-x^2 - 2x)/(2+2x)
ln(x+1) > -x(x+2)/(2x+2)
now, we know ln(1) = 0 , and since x is positive ln(1+x) must be positive.
Looking at the right side we see that for x> 0, both x+2 and 2x+2 must be positive and a positive divided by a positive must be positive.
but that is multiplied by -x, clearly a negative
so the right side of the above inequation is negative
So we have "a positive > a negative" which of course is true.
test it on your calculator, eg let x = .0001 and the x= 5000
or ln(1+x) > x^2/(2+2x) - x
ln(1+x) > (x^2 - 2x - 2x^2)/(2+2x)
ln(1+x) > (-x^2 - 2x)/(2+2x)
ln(x+1) > -x(x+2)/(2x+2)
now, we know ln(1) = 0 , and since x is positive ln(1+x) must be positive.
Looking at the right side we see that for x> 0, both x+2 and 2x+2 must be positive and a positive divided by a positive must be positive.
but that is multiplied by -x, clearly a negative
so the right side of the above inequation is negative
So we have "a positive > a negative" which of course is true.
test it on your calculator, eg let x = .0001 and the x= 5000
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.