Asked by Ashley
How do we evaluate limit of,
lim x-> 0 [ln(x+1)/( (2^x) - 1)]
I tried using the substitution x+1 = e^k , when x tends to 0 so does k, which gave out,
lim k->0 [ k/((2^((e^k) - 1)) -1 ) ]
which I simplified into( for the ease of use let e^k =a)
lim k->0 [k/( ((2^a)/2) - 1)]
lim k->0 [2k/((2^a) -2 )]
which sums up to,
(2*0)/((2^(e^0)) - 2)
(2*0)/(2-2)
which gives out an undefined value as 0/0
How do we solve this?
lim x-> 0 [ln(x+1)/( (2^x) - 1)]
I tried using the substitution x+1 = e^k , when x tends to 0 so does k, which gave out,
lim k->0 [ k/((2^((e^k) - 1)) -1 ) ]
which I simplified into( for the ease of use let e^k =a)
lim k->0 [k/( ((2^a)/2) - 1)]
lim k->0 [2k/((2^a) -2 )]
which sums up to,
(2*0)/((2^(e^0)) - 2)
(2*0)/(2-2)
which gives out an undefined value as 0/0
How do we solve this?
Answers
Answered by
Reiny
How about good old L'Hopital's rule
lim x-> 0 [ln(x+1)/( (2^x) - 1)]
= lim x-> 0 [1/(x+1) / (ln2*2^x)
= (1/1)/(ln2 ( 1)
= 1/ln2 = appr 1.44269..
check: let x = .0001 in the original
= ln(1.0001) / (2^.0001 - 1)
= 1.4425 , not bad, my answer is correct
lim x-> 0 [ln(x+1)/( (2^x) - 1)]
= lim x-> 0 [1/(x+1) / (ln2*2^x)
= (1/1)/(ln2 ( 1)
= 1/ln2 = appr 1.44269..
check: let x = .0001 in the original
= ln(1.0001) / (2^.0001 - 1)
= 1.4425 , not bad, my answer is correct
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.