Did the individuals involved follow the legal guidelines for searches? Why or why not?

Did the exclusionary rule apply in this situation? Why or why not?
Provide one example in which the exclusionary rule would apply if the individuals involved had done something differently. Explain.
Was a warrant used? Why or why not?
What kind of search took place?
What was the ultimate purpose of the search?
What evidence was collected in the search? Outline what you think would have been the steps in collecting this evidence.

case: riley vs california

1 answer

No situation posted. Cannot copy and paste here.