Asked by joeyyyy33
The case of Schenck v. United States (1919) concerned protest activities against American involvement in World War I. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., said that trying to convince draft-age men to resist induction was intended to result in a crime, and posed a “clear and present danger” of succeeding. The Supreme Court decision in the case relates to a limitation on which of the following? (1 point)
A freedom of the press
B free exercise of religion
C freedom of speech
D cruel and unusual punishment
A freedom of the press
B free exercise of religion
C freedom of speech
D cruel and unusual punishment
Answers
Answered by
Ms. Sue
A person trying to convince men to resist induction is exercising freedom of speech.
Answered by
becky
c- freedom of speech
Answered by
joe mama
1-c
2-c
3-a
4-b
5-a
6-b
7-d
8-a
9-d
100% correct on pretest
2-c
3-a
4-b
5-a
6-b
7-d
8-a
9-d
100% correct on pretest
Answered by
BigDocMartins
I can vouch for joe mama's answers, i met him at Saw Con he's a good friend
Answered by
Connections Academy
I would like to inform any student from the academy to not look at these answers, for it is cheating.
Answered by
Student
I would like to inform any Connections Academy Teacher to not look at this webpage or any other websites considered "Cheating" sites, for this is none of your business.
Answered by
Ciel S
umm idk why people think these is cheathing this is to check answer or use if your stuck or what ever number two u would not be on this question of you did not look up the answer so ..
Answered by
bababooey
smd lol
Answered by
Eben
Then why are you on here Connections Academy
Answered by
human being
joe mama is 100% right in 2022 :)
Answered by
Carson
human being is right. joe mama is right in 2022 :)
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.