Asked by Jessie
Roosevelt is arguing that journalists must only attack misconduct when they have valid proof. They must not dig just for the sake of digging; it is offensive to good Americans. Which statement most effectively argues against this claim?
a. Even sensational journalism is valuable because it makes money.
b. Journalistic freedom is guaranteed in the Bill of Rights. c. Roosevelt himself is a dishonest man, so his arguments are invalid.
****d. The government should be more concerned with uncovering corruption.****
a. Even sensational journalism is valuable because it makes money.
b. Journalistic freedom is guaranteed in the Bill of Rights. c. Roosevelt himself is a dishonest man, so his arguments are invalid.
****d. The government should be more concerned with uncovering corruption.****
Answers
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.