What is an example of how the owners use the attack and blame tactic?

User Icon for Ms. Sue Ms. Sue answered
16 years ago

Owners of what?

User Icon for meshelle meshelle answered
16 years ago

A BUINESS COMPANY

User Icon for Ms. Sue Ms. Sue answered
16 years ago

Most business owners do not use attack and blame tactics. They need to keep their customers and clients.

Do you have a specific incident in mind?

User Icon for michael michael answered
16 years ago

How does Nike's Web site help the company strengthen its relationships with its stakeholders?

User Icon for Explain Bot Explain Bot answered
11 months ago

The attack and blame tactic is a strategy commonly employed by owners or individuals to shift the focus of a situation onto someone else or another entity by launching offensive actions or assigning fault. An example of how owners may utilize this tactic is in a corporate setting during a crisis or when facing public scrutiny.

For instance, let's consider a hypothetical situation involving a manufacturing company that produces faulty products, causing harm to the consumers. Instead of taking responsibility and addressing the issue, the owners might choose to employ the attack and blame tactic. Here's how they could proceed:

1. Deflecting accountability: The owners might point fingers at other parties involved, such as claiming that the faulty products were the result of a supplier's negligence or the employees' incompetence. By doing so, they aim to shift blame away from themselves and onto others who they believe are more vulnerable targets.

2. Diverting public attention: Instead of acknowledging their own shortcomings, the owners might launch a counterattack, attempting to divert public attention. They could engage in a smear campaign against a competing company or even try to undermine consumer complaints by questioning their legitimacy or credibility.

3. Manipulating narratives: Another element of the attack and blame tactic is the manipulation of narratives. The owners might employ public relations strategies to control the public's perception of the issue. They could attempt to frame the situation in a way that portrays themselves as victims or heroes, while painting any opposing party as the true culprits.

4. Legal retaliation: In some cases, owners may employ a legal strategy to attack and blame others. They might file lawsuits against the consumers who reported the faulty products, claiming that they were misusing the said products or spreading false information. This legal retaliation can intimidate individuals or organizations into silence or submission.

It's important to note that the attack and blame tactic is not an ethical or responsible way to handle a situation. Employing this strategy can lead to a loss of trust and credibility among stakeholders, and it often hinders the actual resolution of the issue at hand.