Asked by Collins
3cosx+4sinx=5
what is x is too difficulat form me to solve?
Shw working please
what is x is too difficulat form me to solve?
Shw working please
Answers
Answered by
Damon
3 cos x = 5-4 sin x
9 cos^2 x = 25 - 40 sin x + 16 sin^2 x
9 (1 -sin^2x) = 16 sin^2 x -40 sin x + 25
9 - 9 sin^2 x = 16 sin^2 x -40 sin x + 25
0 = 25 sin^2 x - 40 sin x + 16
let z = sin x
25 z^2 - 40 z + 16 = 0
(5 z - 4)(5 z - 4) = 0 wow, that was lucky
sin x = 4/5 :)
9 cos^2 x = 25 - 40 sin x + 16 sin^2 x
9 (1 -sin^2x) = 16 sin^2 x -40 sin x + 25
9 - 9 sin^2 x = 16 sin^2 x -40 sin x + 25
0 = 25 sin^2 x - 40 sin x + 16
let z = sin x
25 z^2 - 40 z + 16 = 0
(5 z - 4)(5 z - 4) = 0 wow, that was lucky
sin x = 4/5 :)
Answered by
Anonymous
Im not in Trig yet but i did look up online trigonometry calculators... see if that help?
PS, got this from 1 of those sites:
3cos(x) + 4sin(x) = 5 : x = 2πn + arcsin(4/5)
Hope this helps.
PS, got this from 1 of those sites:
3cos(x) + 4sin(x) = 5 : x = 2πn + arcsin(4/5)
Hope this helps.
Answered by
Reiny
let's change 3cosx+4sinx into a single sine curve of the form y = a sin (x+k)
we know asin(x+k)
= asinxcosk + acosxsink
comparing our terms
asinxcosk = 4sinx
acosk = 4
a = 4/cosk
acosxsink = 3cosx
a sink = 3
a = 3/sink
then 3/sink = 4/cosk
4sink = 3cosk
sink/cosk = 3/4
tank = 3/4
k = 36.87°
also a^2 = 3^2 + 4^2
a = 5
so 3cosx+4sinx=5 becomes
5sin(x+36.87°) = 5
sin(x+36.87°) = 1
x+36.87° = 90°
<b>x = 53.13°</b>
check:
LS = 3cos53.13 + 4sin53.12
= 4.99958
not bad, we could carry more decimals for more accuracy
of course we could get more solutions by simply adding multiples of 360° to 53.12°
e.g x = 413.13 or x = -306.87° etc
we know asin(x+k)
= asinxcosk + acosxsink
comparing our terms
asinxcosk = 4sinx
acosk = 4
a = 4/cosk
acosxsink = 3cosx
a sink = 3
a = 3/sink
then 3/sink = 4/cosk
4sink = 3cosk
sink/cosk = 3/4
tank = 3/4
k = 36.87°
also a^2 = 3^2 + 4^2
a = 5
so 3cosx+4sinx=5 becomes
5sin(x+36.87°) = 5
sin(x+36.87°) = 1
x+36.87° = 90°
<b>x = 53.13°</b>
check:
LS = 3cos53.13 + 4sin53.12
= 4.99958
not bad, we could carry more decimals for more accuracy
of course we could get more solutions by simply adding multiples of 360° to 53.12°
e.g x = 413.13 or x = -306.87° etc
Answered by
Reiny
Go with Damon's , he used an easier method
(but I thought mine was quite elegant)
(but I thought mine was quite elegant)
Answered by
Damon
well I agree with anonymous :)
Answered by
Anonymous
thnx Damon. im not in trig so i just looked it up :)
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.