Asked by Amy
Internet Source Distortion/Misrepresentation
From media,or the Internet, identify an example of each of the following sources of distortion (faulty causal and/or statistical inference)
a. A study with questionable sponsorship or motives
b. Reliance on insufficient evidence/hasty generalization
c. Unbalanced or biased presentation
d. Unexamined assumptions
e. Faulty causal reasoning
I have to find a source that has all these questions covered.
From media,or the Internet, identify an example of each of the following sources of distortion (faulty causal and/or statistical inference)
a. A study with questionable sponsorship or motives
b. Reliance on insufficient evidence/hasty generalization
c. Unbalanced or biased presentation
d. Unexamined assumptions
e. Faulty causal reasoning
I have to find a source that has all these questions covered.
Answers
Answered by
Ms. Sue
As I understand your question, you can use several different sources.
Any study conducted by a political party is suspect.
Any study conducted by a political party is suspect.
Answered by
Amy
so i can write about any experiment gone wrong that doesnt have legit reasoning?
Answered by
Ms. Sue
It doesn't have to be an experiment.
Answered by
Writeacher
a. A study with questionable sponsorship or motives
<i>Look for a study (or studies) that says something is good for your health, but the study was conducted by a company that makes or markets that product -- for example, anything sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb or any other pharmaceutical company). </i>
b. Reliance on insufficient evidence/hasty generalization
<i>See "e" below!</i>
c. Unbalanced or biased presentation
<i>Just about any TV station or network! As Ms. Sue has said, "Any study conducted by a political party is suspect."</i>
d. Unexamined assumptions
<i>This seems obvious, yes?</i>
e. Faulty causal reasoning
<i>Any study that states unequivocally that X is the cause of Y without proven evidence and well researched reasoning. </i>
<i>Look for a study (or studies) that says something is good for your health, but the study was conducted by a company that makes or markets that product -- for example, anything sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb or any other pharmaceutical company). </i>
b. Reliance on insufficient evidence/hasty generalization
<i>See "e" below!</i>
c. Unbalanced or biased presentation
<i>Just about any TV station or network! As Ms. Sue has said, "Any study conducted by a political party is suspect."</i>
d. Unexamined assumptions
<i>This seems obvious, yes?</i>
e. Faulty causal reasoning
<i>Any study that states unequivocally that X is the cause of Y without proven evidence and well researched reasoning. </i>
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!