Asked by Amy
Internet Source Distortion/Misrepresentation
From media,or the Internet, identify an example of each of the following sources of distortion (faulty causal and/or statistical inference)
a. A study with questionable sponsorship or motives
b. Reliance on insufficient evidence/hasty generalization
c. Unbalanced or biased presentation
d. Unexamined assumptions
e. Faulty causal reasoning
I have to find a source that has all these questions covered.
From media,or the Internet, identify an example of each of the following sources of distortion (faulty causal and/or statistical inference)
a. A study with questionable sponsorship or motives
b. Reliance on insufficient evidence/hasty generalization
c. Unbalanced or biased presentation
d. Unexamined assumptions
e. Faulty causal reasoning
I have to find a source that has all these questions covered.
Answers
Answered by
Ms. Sue
As I understand your question, you can use several different sources.
Any study conducted by a political party is suspect.
Any study conducted by a political party is suspect.
Answered by
Amy
so i can write about any experiment gone wrong that doesnt have legit reasoning?
Answered by
Ms. Sue
It doesn't have to be an experiment.
Answered by
Writeacher
a. A study with questionable sponsorship or motives
<i>Look for a study (or studies) that says something is good for your health, but the study was conducted by a company that makes or markets that product -- for example, anything sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb or any other pharmaceutical company). </i>
b. Reliance on insufficient evidence/hasty generalization
<i>See "e" below!</i>
c. Unbalanced or biased presentation
<i>Just about any TV station or network! As Ms. Sue has said, "Any study conducted by a political party is suspect."</i>
d. Unexamined assumptions
<i>This seems obvious, yes?</i>
e. Faulty causal reasoning
<i>Any study that states unequivocally that X is the cause of Y without proven evidence and well researched reasoning. </i>
<i>Look for a study (or studies) that says something is good for your health, but the study was conducted by a company that makes or markets that product -- for example, anything sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb or any other pharmaceutical company). </i>
b. Reliance on insufficient evidence/hasty generalization
<i>See "e" below!</i>
c. Unbalanced or biased presentation
<i>Just about any TV station or network! As Ms. Sue has said, "Any study conducted by a political party is suspect."</i>
d. Unexamined assumptions
<i>This seems obvious, yes?</i>
e. Faulty causal reasoning
<i>Any study that states unequivocally that X is the cause of Y without proven evidence and well researched reasoning. </i>
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.