Which kind is more interesting?
Something with alliteration?
http://www.answers.com/alliteration
or something vague?
using alliteration. Vince will use a vague, broad title. Who is using a better strategy to develop a good essay
title?
A. Both Cary and Vince
B. Only Cary
C. Only Vince
D. Neither Cary nor Vince
I Need some help here please.
my answer was c. but is wrong.
Something with alliteration?
http://www.answers.com/alliteration
or something vague?
Do you think something vague and broad would make people want to read that paper?
http://www.answers.com/vague
Alliteration is a literary device that involves the repetition of the initial sounds in words. It can be used to create a memorable and catchy title. For example, "Sally's Sensational Science Experiment."
On the other hand, a vague, broad title is one that lacks specificity and fails to convey a clear idea or focus. Examples of vague, broad titles include "The Importance of Education" or "The Meaning of Life."
With this understanding, we can analyze the strategies of Cary and Vince:
Cary, by using alliteration, is trying to make the title more engaging, memorable, and potentially appealing to the reader. Alliteration can draw attention to the title and give a hint about the content of the essay. This strategy indicates that Cary is putting thought into creating a title that stands out and reflects the essay's theme, which can be a good approach to developing a strong essay title.
Vince, on the other hand, is using a vague, broad title. This type of title is less specific and does not convey a clear idea or focus. It may make it difficult for readers to understand the essay's main topic or purpose. Vague, broad titles generally lack the ability to capture the reader's attention and may fail to generate interest.
Based on these explanations, the correct answer would be B. Only Cary. Cary's use of alliteration indicates a more effective strategy in developing a good essay title compared to Vince's vague, broad title strategy.