Asked by Ashley
Let x and y be real numbers. Then x=y if and only if abs(x-y)< epsilon for every epsilon>0
Answers
Answered by
Damon
LOL, well I suppose one could prove it somehow. It seems to belabor the obvious though.
Answered by
Ashley
I honestly have no clue how to even start this proof. Other than assume x=y and then assume that abs(x-y)<epsilon
Answered by
Damon
well, draw two points on a number line maybe a distance epsilon apart then let epsilon go to zero.
Answered by
Damon
on second thought draw x as a point on a number line, then y points epsilon to the right and to the left. Then let epsilon ---> 0
Answered by
Ashley
I'm still not seeing it. I have not used epsilon before today
Answered by
Ashley
I know that if x=y, for any epsilon>0, abs(x-y)=0<epsilon
Answered by
Damon
well epsilon is anything you want it to be, but usually you make it a small number and let it approach zero.
If x = 5
and y = 7
then |x-y| = epsilon
now we would call epsilon = 2
BUT
x is only equal to y if |x-y|< ANY epsilon bigger than zero, including e = .0000000001
so when could |x-y| be that small?
Only if x is awfully close to y
but epsilon could be much smaller than .0000000000001, in fact our equality is only true if epsilon is so small we can not tell it is there at all.
If x = 5
and y = 7
then |x-y| = epsilon
now we would call epsilon = 2
BUT
x is only equal to y if |x-y|< ANY epsilon bigger than zero, including e = .0000000001
so when could |x-y| be that small?
Only if x is awfully close to y
but epsilon could be much smaller than .0000000000001, in fact our equality is only true if epsilon is so small we can not tell it is there at all.
Answered by
Ashley
Okay, so since epsilon has to be the smallest number passible x has to equal y.
Answered by
Damon
yes
it has to be for any old epsilon, including one that is vanishingly small so that the difference between x and y is so tiny it does not exist.
it has to be for any old epsilon, including one that is vanishingly small so that the difference between x and y is so tiny it does not exist.
Answered by
Ashley
How would I write that though, since epsilon has to be greater than 0 and abs(x-y) has to be less than epsilon. would i suppose that x doesn't equal y, then epsilon <0.. then epsilon is less than abs(x-y)/2, then abs(x-y)<epsilon<abs(x-y)/2. which contradicts abs(x-y)< epsilon for all epsilon<0.
Answered by
Damon
You say that as epsilon ---> 0, |x-y|--->0
Answered by
Ashley
Thank you
Answered by
Damon
The key word here is ** EVERY ** epsilon, including one vanishingly small .
Answered by
Damon
You are welcome.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.