“The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office . . . The person of the king of Great Britain is sacred and inviolable; there is no constitutional tribunal to which he is amenable . . .”
–The Federalist, No. 69
According to the passage, how is a king different from a constitutional president?
A. A king is subject to natural law.
B. A king is subject to the rule of law.
C. A president is subject to natural law.
D. A president is subject to the rule of law.
2 answers
I'll be glad to check your answer.
D. A president is subject to the rule of law
1 answer