Answers by visitors named: Patrick, Ph.D.
Your question isn't clear enough to be answered, probably because the name "Team Canadian Mission" isn't the exact formal name of the organization you're asking about.
Please provide the EXACT name of the organization and the EXACT name of the activity.
This is to test your knowledge of "adverbs." "Adverbs" are words that are used for the purpose of telling "HOW" an action was done, in what way.
For example, he walked "slowly." HOW did he walk? "Slowly."
She screamed "loudly." Sure she scremed, but HOW did she scream? "Loudly."
Notice that within the word "adverb" you see the word "verb". This is a reminder that adverbs and verbs are related to one another.
Words that end in "ly" and are used to describe HOW an action is done are "adverbs."
Of course, people who are obsessed with grammar aren't satisfied that you learn how most adverbs are used. The want to test you on the exceptions to the rule. Sentences "B" and "D" above are exceptions to the rule because, in cases where the verb describes a perception, like "to taste" and "to feel," the "ly" is NOT used on the end of the adverb. People feel <b>sad.</b> They don't feel "sadly," probably because there's not much physical action involved in feeling, and so "feel" is hardly a verb at all.
Anyway, that's the distinction that they are testing you about, and maybe the only way to get these questions right is (a) to understand the explanation above and (b) to memorize the verbs that do not take "ly" adverbs, e.g. "feel," "taste," look," "smell," "sound"... What they all have in common is that they're about the five senses, so don't use a "ly" adverb to describe how someone uses their five senses.
"He looked longingly" is correct.
"He looked badly" is not correct. The first is about an action while the second is about an appearance, which doesn't involve much action. When the verb involves a sense appearance, don't use an adverb ending with "ly."
Likewise, if you "feel bad" then you feel "down" and sad.
But, if you feel "badly," then you are bad at feeling. You are bad at doing the act of feeling. If you are bad at doing the act of feeling, then you don't feel badly; you don't feel anything at all.
So, what was the worse thing that each party did and what was the result of that behavior?
Did their behavior have the results they expected or did it have unexpected results?
Divide 560,444 by 350
560,444
________
350
Now, the answer won't give an even number; it'll be a number plus a fraction. Since you can buy half a 0.35 of a gallon of paint, and since the questions asks for the result in gallons, logically you probably have to round the number of to the next highest round number.
For instance, if the calculation says you need 1000.156 gallons of paint, that means you need 1001 gallons of paint, because you can't buy 0.156 gallons of paint, as a practical matter.
Well, since I can't remember the answer from the Bar Exam, let's use the process of elimination.
"Slight care" is not a legal standard under any circumstances, so that's not the answer. Cancel out "slight care."
The first question to ask to resolve this question is what "duty of care," if any, did the friend from whom the bike was stolen owe to the friend who was the owner of the bike. Common law assigns a "duty of care" based on the relationship between the people, e.g. as between a hotel owner and a hotel guest, or a storage company and the person storing his goods there.
"<b>duty of care n.</b>: a requirement that a person act toward others and the public with watchfulness, attention, caution and prudence that a reasonable person in the circumstances would. If a person's actions do not meet this standard of care, then the acts are considered negligent, and any damages resulting may be claimed in a lawsuit for negligence.
Here we have a bailor/bailee relationship between the boy who asked someone to hold the bike (the "bailor") and the friend who held the bike (the "bailee").
<b>"When a bailor receives the sole benefit from the bailment, the bailee has a lesser duty to care for the property and is financially responsible only if he or she has been grossly negligent or has acted in bad faith in taking care of the property.</b> FreeDictionary
The fact that you're not PAYING your friend to watch your bike, and your friend did not ask to borrow your bike would both be reasons for a court not to require him to exercise that much care.