Answers by visitors named: Max

Thank you Ms. Sue for responding so quickly. What seemed insurmountable, is going to be manageable. Thanks!

Qu'est qu'il y a dans la boutique?

Thanks for the help! I found exactly what I needed....Max

I did that - but was lost as to how to describe the structure of well developed double blind study.

Is this punctuation correct: "Can I come over to your house after school today?" asked Jack.

I see. thank you!

England's constitutional states opposed to Spain, France, Russias absolute monarchy

Thanks - I think I got a handle on it

Beeswax

experimenting?

thank you so much, i hate simplifying big numbers they throw me off

yay... thank you

would the answer be 3ft 11in?

I agree

Yay... cool thanks

thank you for checking my answers for me

sorry, I mean *incognito

thank you!

I am not answer grazing. I just don't know how to do these couple problems at all. I have no idea where to start.

What is the equation you use, knowing distance and time, to get Vi?

Ok I figured out Vi. Now I don't get what you put in for Hf because you can't have two variables to find out Hi?

I'm still not able to find Hi with the given equation. Could you possibly explain more on how to get the initial height?

I got 61.37 but I'm getting it wrong

the newtons first law one was wrong so I'm not sure what it would rather be

what is mg?

Then would that mean A is 2 then 3, B is 2 then 4, and C is 2 then 3?

Wait wouldn't the normal force for C be perpendicular to and away from the ramp?

My teacher had said that all 3 normal forces were perpendicular and away from the ramp so idk

I know it shouldn't be realistic. I don't know whether it is optimistic or pessimistic though.

Say India

Could the answer possibly be E because it seems as if there could be more than one answer to the question?

so W = (2PI(6.37x10^6))/21,744sec 6.04hr = 21,744 sec and then for r = 117,367 I don't get what to do afterwards

it was wrong the phenyl is the aromatic benzene

I am getting .2858 But its wrong

Okay I think I wrote the question wrong. You need to find the number of moles in 5mL of the substance given the density and the molecular weight.

My teacher says it is wrong and that is ne of the other choices between colony,nation-state, state, province, nation

I.D.K. that's hard.

How do you determine the electric charge? What does X represent?

Actually I know them now but what is M for C) on the third question?

for the first question i mean

10.6m

I apologize for the disjointedness, I pipetted 5 ml of KIO3, 25 ml of H20, 10ml of Acetic acid, and 1.3g of KI I then Titrated the sodium thiosulfate did 3 trials. Trial one gave me 28.22 ml, I then calculated (M) by taking KI 1.3 g/MW(166.00)then dividing that number by (28.22/1000 ml) to get (M)of Na2S2O3

Then i did 3 more trials consisting of 10 ml of Cu(IO3)2, 25 ml of H20, 10ml of Acetic acid, and 1.3g of KI I now need to find (M) of IO3 so i can find the Ksp of the reaction

I know the Ksp equation is S=[Cu2+]=(1/2)[IO3-] Ksp=4S^3

Unfortunately, my KIO3 was given to me in mL from my professor so i have no clue what the grams of KIO3. I tried to figure out the moles of Na2S2O3 solution but looking over it i believe that 0.28 M is incorrect. The info I have is: 2.6g of Na2S2O3 was added to roughly 1 mL of distilled water Titrated this solution into a beaker filled with 5 ml of KIO3, 25 ml of H20, 10ml of Acetic acid, and 1.3g of KI so I figured I could find Molarity of Na2S2O3 solution by taking (grams of KI/MW of KI)/(mL of Na2S2O3/1000)

I know I have to find the (M) of the Na2S2O3 in the standard, then find the (M) of IO3- to find the Ksp but Im not finding (M)Na2S2O3 and I have no clue how to find (M) of IO3-

Sorry, your explanation made too many logical leaps. How did you get from 1/5 to 1/50??? It's garbage like this that makes you want to never see physics problems again.

So you would get 22x-10y=-8? how would you combine that with -5x+4y=7?

THanks guys! i get it now!

You subtract? arent you supposed to add?

THanks Damon and Jen! (especially Jen ;)

Thanks for the help

thanks

Is wikipedia a reliabe source?

OK thanks I still don't understand this question!? Could you just like give me a base for this argument? becuase i serioulsy don't get what this question is asking

Well, its was just like something for people to believe in so the church created hope? and idk know what im talking about. I feel like im talking in circles :(

well then thanks but not thanks for the help, becuase those words are TOO BIG for me to understand....

i don't know how ...please helpe me .

Should have been in a table but i guess it could not fit there. Sample 1 = 1.50 (0.000300M SCN (mL)), SCN (M) = ? sample 2 = 3.50 (0.000300M SCN (mL)), SCN (M) = ?

Find the LCM of all those numbers. The answer will be the common denominator.

I think one reason is that there are a lot of grammatical errors.

Do you know what slope and y intercept is?

What is your question?

0.43

First, put the equation in slope-intercept form. 6x-7y=4 -7y=-6x+4 -y=-6/7x+4/7 y=6/7x-4/7 So the slope of the parallel line will also be 6/7. Now use the point slope formula to find the equation of the line. y-y1=m(x-x1) y-(-2)=6/7(x-5) y+2=6/7(x-5) y+2=6/7x-30/7 y=6/7x-44/7 That is the equation of the line.

38.5 -24.1 = 14.4

What information???

For word choice, what words do I have to change?

A. There are 13 hearts from a standard deck of 52 cards. Therefore, there is a 13/52, or 1/4, chance of choosing a heart. Now, there are 12 out of 51 hearts to choose from. The probability of choosing a second heart is 12/51, or 4/17. Thus, the probability of drawing 2 hearts is 1/4*4/17 = 1/17.

Refer to A. for the answer to b.

Oops, I meant 12 hearts out of 51 cards, not 51 hearts.

First, let's consider the probability that none of the balls are red, or all of them are blue. There are 9 balls, 4 of which are blue. So the chance that 3 blue balls will be chosen is 4/9 * 3/8 * 2/7, or 1/21. You can do the rest from here.

Here is the revision: For homework, I have to use those two lessons that Julie learned in the novel Julie of the Wolves to make an essay. Here is the essay. Would you please give feedback? The story Julie of the Wolves by Jean Craighead George is about a girl named Julie, who is called Miyax in Eskimo villages. For most of the story, Julie is lost in the Alaskan tundra in the winter looking for her father, Kapugen, a skilled hunter. While doing that, Julie learns several lessons crucial to survival: learning to communicate with wolves and knowing that the "hour of the Eskimo and wolf is over", which means traditional Eskimo life has changed to modern ways. First of all, Julie learned to communicate with a nearby wolf pack while she was looking for food in the wilderness of Alaska. While lying face down in a bank of snow, she carefully observed the wolves' motions and behavior. After days of watching, Julie learned how to tell a pup to lie down, how to ask for food from the adult wolves, and how to hail the leader of the pack, Amaroq. At one point, the wolf pack killed a caribou right in front of her shelter, and they shared the meat with Julie. By learning the wolf language, Julie could survive with support from the wolves. Without this valuable knowledge, Julie wouldn't have been able to survive in the tundra for a long time. She would only last for a few weeks. In addition, Julie learned that traditional Eskimo life has changed to modern life. Julie learned this lesson when she visited her father Kapugen and his new family in the town of Kangik. She realizes if she continues to live her traditional ways, she may be able to survive, but she will be lonely. Therefore, at the end of the story, Julie pointed her boots toward Kapugen once again. Julie also figured out that she could still do good living the modern life. She realizes that if she lives this new life, she may be able to be rich and to prosper in a town like Kangik, just as what Kapugen did. She would be able to support a town with lots of food and money. As you can see, the lessons Julie learns throughout the story Julie of the Wolves are crucial to her survival. If she didn't learn any of those lessons, she wouldn't be able to survive in the tundra and in the modern Eskimo community.

Wait, don't read that one. That still has some mistakes. Please wait for the real one...

Here is the real revision: The story Julie of the Wolves by Jean Craighead George is about a girl named Julie, who is called Miyax in Eskimo villages. For most of the story, Julie was lost in the Alaskan tundra in the winter looking for her father, Kapugen, a skilled hunter. While doing that, Julie learned several lessons crucial to survival: learning to communicate with wolves and knowing that the "hour of the Eskimo and wolf is over", which means traditional Eskimo life has changed to modern ways. First of all, Julie learned to communicate with a nearby wolf pack while she was looking for food in the wilderness of Alaska. While lying face down in a bank of snow, she carefully observed the wolves' motions and behavior. After days of watching, Julie learned how to tell a pup to lie down, how to ask for food from the adult wolves, and how to hail the leader of the pack, Amaroq. At one point, the wolf pack killed a caribou right in front of her shelter, and they shared the meat with Julie. By learning the wolf language, Julie could survive with support from the wolves. Without this valuable knowledge, Julie wouldn't have been able to survive in the tundra for a long time. She would only last for a few weeks. In addition, Julie learned that traditional Eskimo life has changed to modern life. Julie learned this lesson when she visited her father Kapugen and his new family in the town of Kangik. She realized if she continues to live her traditional ways, she may be able to survive, but she will be lonely. Therefore, at the end of the story, Julie pointed her boots toward Kapugen once again. Julie also figured out that she could still do good living the modern life. She realized that if she lives this new life, she may be able to be rich and to prosper in a town like Kangik, just as what Kapugen did. She would be able to support a town with lots of food and money. As you can see, the lessons Julie learned throughout the story Julie of the Wolves are crucial to her survival. If she didn't learn any of those lessons, she wouldn't be able to survive in the tundra and in the modern Eskimo community.

That's correct since 21 * 20 / 2 is 210.

The story Julie of the Wolves by Jean Craighead George is about a girl named Julie, who is called Miyax in Eskimo villages. For most of the story, Julie was lost in the Alaskan tundra in the winter looking for her father, Kapugen, a skilled hunter. While doing that, Julie learned several lessons crucial to survival: learning to communicate with wolves and knowing that the "hour of the Eskimo and wolf is over", which means traditional Eskimo life has changed to modern ways. First of all, Julie learned to communicate with a nearby wolf pack while she was looking for food in the wilderness of Alaska. While lying face down in a bank of snow, she carefully observed the wolves' motions and behavior. After days of watching, Julie learned how to tell a pup to lie down, to ask for food from the adult wolves, and to hail the leader of the pack, Amaroq. At one point, the wolf pack killed a caribou right in front of her shelter, and they shared the meat with Julie. By learning the wolf language, Julie could survive with support from the wolves. Without this valuable knowledge, Julie wouldn't have been able to survive in the tundra for a long time. She would only last for a few weeks. In addition, Julie learned that traditional Eskimo life has changed to modern life. Julie learned this lesson when she visited her father Kapugen and his new family in the town of Kangik. She realized if she continues to live her traditional ways, she may be able to survive, but she will be lonely. Therefore, at the end of the story, Julie pointed her boots toward Kapugen once again. Julie also figured out that she could still do good living the modern life. She realized that if she lives this new life, she may be able to be rich and to prosper in a town like Kangik, just as what Kapugen did. She would be able to support a town with lots of food and money. In conclusion, the lessons Julie learned throughout the story Julie of the Wolves are crucial to her survival. If she didn't learn any of those lessons, she wouldn't be able to survive in the tundra and in the modern Eskimo community.

That leaves a + b/c = (ef)/d. So you subtract b/c on both sides to isolate a.

Could you please rephrase the first sentence?

Yes.

Here is the next revision... The story Julie of the Wolves by Jean Craighead George is about a girl named Julie, who is called Miyax in Eskimo villages. For most of the story, Julie was lost in the Alaskan tundra in the winter looking for her father, Kapugen, a skilled hunter. While doing that, Julie learned several lessons crucial to survival: learning to communicate with wolves and knowing that the "hour of the Eskimo and wolf is over," which means traditional Eskimo life has changed to modern ways. First of all, Julie learned to communicate with a nearby wolf pack while she was looking for food in the wilderness of Alaska. While lying face down in a bank of snow, she carefully observed the wolves' motions and behavior. After days of watching, Julie learned how to tell a pup to lie down, to ask for food from the adult wolves, and to hail the leader of the pack, Amaroq. At one point, the wolf pack killed a caribou right in front of her shelter, and they shared the meat with Julie. By learning the wolf language, Julie could survive with support from the wolves. Without this valuable knowledge, Julie wouldn't have been able to survive in the tundra for a long time. She would only last for a few weeks. In addition, Julie learned that traditional Eskimo life has changed to modern life. Julie learned this lesson when she visited her father Kapugen and his new family in the town of Kangik. She realized if she continued to live her traditional ways, she might be able to survive, but she would be lonely. Therefore, at the end of the story, Julie pointed her boots toward Kapugen once again. Julie also figured out that she could still do well living the modern life. She realized that if she lived this new life, she might be able to be rich and to prosper in a town like Kangik, just as Kapugen did. She would be able to support a town with lots of food and money. In conclusion, the lessons Julie learned throughout the story Julie of the Wolves are crucial to her survival. If she hadn't learn any of those lessons, she wouldn't be able to survive in the tundra and in the modern Eskimo community.

Which points are M and N the midpoints of?

Thank you so much for spending all that time proofreading my essay!

First, write a/b + 1/d with a common denominator. ad/bd + b/bd (ad + b)/bd You can easily take the reciprocal from here.

Substitute x with x + h. f(x + h) = -10(x + h)^2 - 42(x + h) - 17 Expand and simplify.

Here is how the equation should look: a/b + 1/d = 1/c ad/bd + b/bd = 1/c (ad + b)/bd = 1/c Taking the reciprocal of both sides... bd/(ad + b) = c

You're welcome.

"Jim does not play football" is a negation of "Jim plays football," so the first part is ~p. The symbol for "or" is V. Lastly, "Michael does not play basketball" is a negation of "Michael plays basketball." Thus, the third part would be ~q. ~p V ~q

III is II and I combined.

Yes, it is valid, according to the law of detachment. If the first and second premise are true, then the third is true.

q p ~p q->~p T. T. F. F T. F. T. T F. T. T. T F. F. T. T

The symbol for "if.... then" is "->" The symbol for "and" is "^" So the symbolic form is (r^q)->p.

p. q. p<->q T. T. T T. F. F F. T. F F. F. T

Assume that p = Nicholas Thompson teaches this course. Assume q = I will get a passing grade.  The symbolic form is ~q->~p The truth table is: p.       ~p        q.       ~q.       ~q->~p T.        F        T.        F.               T T.        F        F.        T.               F F.        T        T.        F.               T F.        T        F.        T.               T So the conclusion is valid.

~q = Teachers are not happy. p V ~q = Students are happy, or teachers are not happy. ~(p V ~q) = Students are not happy, or teachers are happy.

What do you think the answer is? I will be glad to check your answer.

Wait!!! I take that back.

Look at "before she had an accident."

No. What is the past participle of "drive?"

~p = F ~p ^ ~q = F (~p ^ q) ^ r = F ~[(~p ^ q) ^ r] = T