Answers by visitors named: Chris

A great way to get to Vancouver, British Columbia, is by train. Is 'train' the subject or "way" or even Vancover, BC? And is 'to get' or 'is' the predicate? Thank you, Chris

Thank you for your response, but I am still confused. I am looking for the simple subject (way?) and predicate (is). Thanks in advance for your help! Chris

How did u figure #2 out?

Thank you Mr. Pursley

i see what your saying. so multiply the rate by two to get the rate of NO? but what is NO2 forming

to take out square roots, just basically square the number. for example to take square root of four is 2 but to take out the square root is square the four and your answer remains 4

the answer is 0

HOCH2CH2OH, FCH2CH2OH, FCH2CH2F because of decreased hydrogen bonding from left to right

jumping to rising?

stem is to daisy

so its 6n < 1680 ÷6 ÷6 n < 280

1.29e-03?

(-9)-4w+7w=42 (-9)-(-4)+7w=42 (-9)-3w=42 +3w +3w (-9)=42+3w -42 -42 (-9)-42 (-9)+(-42) 3w= -51 /3w /3w w= -17 I got -17. How is this possible?

I know that it was positive. I wrote a minus sign, not a negative sign. What do I have to do. P.S- Sorry, but I really want to get it right.

Oh, okay I understand now. Thank you. I did the correct work.

So, my answer is correct?

Okay, thank you so much, DrBob222.

Lewis acids are electron pair acceptors. Therefore, if they come into contact with your organs or skins, they pull electrons away from vital cell components, wreaking havoc on your body. This accounts for the "burn" you experience after coming into contact with an acid. The stronger and more concentrated the acid, the more powerful effect it can have. I could go far more into detail on the physiological and biochemical effects of both...what course are you taking and to what depth is the answer supposed to be?

About what they are, how it helps your body, what they do in your body, etc... Basically, anything that informal.

Two methods of logical reasoning are deductive and inductive reasoning: (a) Deductive: Facts, certainty, syllogisms, validity, truth of premises sound arguments & conclusions, and (b) Inductive: Diverse facts, probability, generalizations, hypotheses, analogies inductive strength. This question is asking about deductive reasoning (e.g., syllogisms). A syllogism is a form of logic using deductive reasoning consisting of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion; for example, All humans are mortal, the major premise, I am a human, the minor premise, therefore, I am mortal, the conclusion. It is reasoning from the general to the specific, e.g. deduction. Thus, every syllogism is a sequence of three propositions such that the first two imply the third, the conclusion. There are three basic types of syllogism: hypothetical, disjunctive, and categorical. In other words, when an argument claims that the truth of its premises guarantees the truth of its conclusion, it is said to involve a deductive inference. Deductive reasoning holds to a very high standard of correctness. A deductive inference succeeds only if its premises provide such absolute and complete support for its conclusion that it would be utterly inconsistent to suppose that the premises are true but the conclusion false. Notice that each argument either meets this standard or else it does not; there is no middle ground. Some deductive arguments are perfect, and if their premises are in fact true, then it follows that their conclusions must also be true, no matter what else may happen to be the case. All other deductive arguments are no good at all—their conclusions may be false even if their premises are true, and no amount of additional information can help them in the least. 1). Truth and Validity Thus, logical syllogisms (deductive reasoning) requires such a strong relationship between premises and conclusion. It is therefore worthwhile to consider the standard of correctness for deductive arguments in some detail. A deductive argument is said to be valid when the inference from premises to conclusion is perfect. Here are two equivalent ways of stating that standard: · If the premises of a valid argument are true, then its conclusion must also be true. · It is impossible for the conclusion of a valid argument to be false while its premises are true. (Considering the premises as a set of propositions, we will say that the premises are true only on those occasions when each and every one of those propositions is true.) Any deductive argument (syllogisms) that is not valid is invalid: it is possible for its conclusion to be false while its premises are true, so even if the premises are true, the conclusion may turn out to be either true or false. Notice that the validity of the inference of a deductive argument is independent of the truth of its premises; both conditions must be met in order to be sure of the truth of the conclusion. Of the eight distinct possible combinations of truth and validity, only one is ruled out completely: SEE ATTACHED RESPONSE FOR FORMATING Premises Inference Conclusion True Valid True XXXX Invalid True False False Valid True False Invalid True False The only thing that cannot happen is for a logical syllogism (deductive reasoning) to have true premises and a valid inference but a false conclusion 2). Soundness Some logicians designate the combination of true premises and a valid inference as a sound argument; it is a piece of reasoning whose conclusion must be true. The trouble with every other case is that it gets us nowhere, since either at least one of the premises is false, or the inference is invalid, or both. The conclusions of such arguments may be either true or false, so they are entirely useless in any effort to gain new information.

I still don't completely understand how you got x=7 forgive me for being slow, just never liked math.

OH i get it, ah alright. Now to get y=x-9 i just plug in x=7 right? and would leave me with y= -2 right? and it would look like this y=7-9 and y=-2

How did you get x=1? by pugging it in with the 8 right?

il était bon que l'eau n'ait pas été froide

no it is oxygen! DUH!

Search the first sentence on google. It is the first website. A pdf that has test answers on it. You will findd it there. It wont let me post the url for some reason It is on this test

Thanks

which colonies were founded as a result of push factors

answer is actually : 3a square root of 5. 45a^2 simplied is 9a^2 x 5 square root of 9a^2 is 3a. Square root of 5 is radical 5. Squaring your answer would check to see if you have the correct answer. Thus mine is the correct one. Sarah was close.

Arrg, stop deleting my message, my last one was correct. first of all, cutting 2 slices of a log will make it into 3. if it took 12 minutes to cut 2 slices into 3, it takes 6 minuts to cut a slice. Now taking the same log, you need 6 pieces. so cutting 3 more times in addition to the first two would mean 30 mins. 2 slices = 3 pieces from 3 logs, 3 slice = 6 pieces 5 slice x 6 minutes each = 30 mins

I believe it was William Howard Taft.

You can get the answers on either pfanswers7[dot]co[dot]cc

fwetws

i will go to him and give the phone to him

A car trveling at 88km/h overtakes a bus trveling at 64kmlh. If the bus has a 1.5h head start, how far from the starting point does the car overtake the bus?

sorry i forgot to put that it took the whole trip 5hr

solve for the underlined 6x+4y=16y-6 _

Are they, D,B,&R???????

To help learn who!!??

They are eithe rcounted by 2's or counted by a straight 1.

I cant use any Statergies Accept for a Table

Thank you!

i remeber now its y

oh i was thinking of something else

what about for The expression using radical notation: (6ab)^4/3

okay, thanks

Nevermind I figured it out it is sqrtx(x^2y+3y)

do you mean 20sqrt symbol a^9

So it would be 12-5sqrtx-3x?

Is the answer (23/13)+(43/13)i

Chemical sometimes used to make the specimen visible

the memory rule is to remember.

now if i wrote out the equation.. N2 + H2 ==> NH3 then balanced it.. 3N2 + H2 ==> 2NH3 could the numbers given possibly just be extra information that is unneeded, and the volume of ammonia simply be 2 * 22.42 because its at STP? i really would appreciate some help here..

ok i wrote the other coefficients wrong wow its getting too late for this

Erm.. ok.. PV = nRT (2.25)(13.7) = n(.08206)(366.15) n = 1.026 1.026molH2 * 2molNH3/3molH2 = .684molNH3 PV=nRT (?)(?)=(.684)(.08206)(?)

Ohh, nevermind, your saying I should use the same values I used before for P and T ok.. what I got was 9.13L NH3 thank you so much for your help!

continued 4c=3d+3 c=d-1 i got (6,7) x=1/2y+3 2x-y=6 i got no solution 8x+2y=13 4x+y=11 i got no solution 2x-y=-4 -3x+y=-9 i got (13,30) 3x-5y=11 x-3y=1 i got (7,2)

I'm going to dig a Love Canal in your lawn... tomorrow night. 8:36. Silhouette. Lamp post. You know the drill.

I guess I should of been specific with my question. What would be the possessive form of: foxes fur, monkeys tails, and pony hooves

ugh my bad the information I'm given is: O2 ==> 2 O(g)ΔHºrxn=498kJ/mol O(g) + O2(g) ==> O3ΔHºrxn = /106kJ/mol I think what I'm supposed to do is change the two reactions I'm given by either reversing them or multiplying by a coefficient, then doing the same thing to the enthalpy, but I'm confused about how i go about doing that

1 *(O2 ==> 2 O(g)ΔHºrxn=498kJ/mol) 2 * (O(g) + O2(g) ==> O3ΔHºrxn = -106kJ/mol) O2 + 2O + 2O2 ==> 2O + 2O3 3O2 ==> 2O3 498-212=286ΔHºrxn is that right? and if so, how did you know which numbers to multiply each equation by?

I think understand the concept but could you give me an example with numbers?

no idea.

by: par to: pour due : dû

Unité d'étude indépendante

thank you very much!

It looks right, but I can't be sure if you're entirely correct. Did you use your textbook to find these values?

I have a question for Mrs. Sue. When you used quotations around University when describing Ashford were you trying to suggest something? I am about to finish my accounting degree there and have often wondered if I will fin discrimination because of the stigma that is associated with it.

If your first equation is x^(1/3) - 2/5 =0 then x= (2/5)^3 = (2^3)/(5^3) = (8/125) = 0.064 for your second equation I believe you should do the following: (x-4)^3/2 = -6 First raise both to the 2/3 power to get rid of the ^3/2. (((x-4)^3/2)^(2/3)))=(-6)^(2/3) =>(x-4)=((-6)^(2/3))=> x = ((-6)^(2/3))+4 => x = 36^(1/3) + 4

I think they are two separate questions and since the -6 is on the right sideto find x one would square both sides and find the cube of that result then subtract add four. I could be mistaken.

I think they are two separate questions and since the -6 is on the right sideto find x one would square both sides and find the cube root of that result then add four. I could be mistaken

You are a god.

Wow, thanks.

Tell him theta was just a random representative and in no way correlated with radians/degrees.

And your question is? Do you want simplification? If so: (81y^30)/(2z) should fit the bill. Remember when you have powers inside a bracket taken to another power outside of the bracket ex: (2x^2)^3 The powers multiply together, so (2x^2)^3=(2^3)(x^6). As for the y^2 on the denominator of your problem: (y^32)/(y^2)=y^30, the powers are subtracted.

(3/4)(1/5)(3/10)=9/200 Multiply all of the values on top for the numerator. Multiply all of the values on the bottom of the fractions for the denominator. Is that a 6*(2/3)/(10/21)? If so: =(12/3)/(10/21) = 4 / (10/21) = (4*21)/10 = 84/10 = 8.4

C and D are worded extremely poor.

I plugged that into my graphing calculator and that isn't right. Could someone help?

12 = 10X X = 12/10 X = 1.2 got it....

The entry that I would recommend is: Cash $2000 Deposits received (liability account) $2000 As the money is used: Debit deposits received $XXXX Credit Income account $XXXX

Wait... so it's 3 multiplied by 4? Sorry, I'm not used to reading when it's typed out.

The system is an Atwood machine, by the way.

cos A = .1 In your calculator type in: cos^-1(.1) and for sec D: 1. 1/cos D = 1.8 2. 1.8 Cos D = 1 3. 1/1.8 = Answer 4. cos^-1 (Answer from step 3)

I think the poem is just about a mother trying to reassure her kid and trying to make her feel better. Maybe trying to calm her down, kids can get restless.

Ok, I'm kind of confused. A log's base typically 10 right? Why would you write log 3^(2-x)? Shouldn't it be log(sub3) 2-x) ?

Yeah, it was to solve for A. I assumed it was to multiply by 3. Seeing as 4^3 = 64. log(sub a) 4 = .321

How does the meter in this line emphasize this use of alliteration? Help please! The line is And the sheen of their spears was like stars on the sea. I do not even know what the meter is in this line. The last two websites help alittle but I still don't know this.

Thanks for the suggestion, however I have to complete it using small models with plasticine etc. It doesn't need to be highly accurate, I just need something that can show a difference between the 2 types of crashes I suppose.

All good, can be closed

oh, and i just wanted to add my opinion on this.. don't know if it is right because i can't find info to back it up.. but I'd assume that Canada is at a disadvantage because countries like China and India can produce plastics at low-cost, low labour prices.. thus countries are going to buy from them, compared to Canada. However, my teacher did suggest that Canada is at a competitive advantage, as we have many chemical plants in Canada, and these chemical plants produce the chemicals that go into making the plastics, thus we do not need to import more products to produce plastics from other countries.. which does lower cost

im guessing feldspars because they are used in everyday products such as glass and ceramics is that right please correct me if i'm wrong

feel free to add extras

No promises this is right, but: Normal force is acting up on the bag, and that is given to be a maximum of 50.8 N. To balance this force is the mg force which points strait down towards the ground. By equating mg = 50.8 and g = 9.81 then you can solve for m.

Si, I am giving most of these in the command form, we need at least 10 informal commands and 4 negative commands. Although most of this helped me, I am still a little confused about using a reflexive command like te acueste... and yes, I go to bed at 6 and wake up at 4, it helps me procrastinate and I'm getting enough sleep in the process

whether you think most Americans believe these misconceptions, and why or why not.

It means where are the hot women

thanks for you help and especially explanation

Pg 201 of techniques under the subtitle "Poor Separation of a Mixture" should answer #2 for you.