Scientists previously thought that frogs

  1. Scientists previously thought that frogs and coelacanth are most closely related due to physical characteristics. With DNA
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    2. Unknown asked by Unknown
    3. views icon 108 views
  2. Scientists previously thought that frogs and coelacanth are most closely related due to physical characteristics. With DNA
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    2. views icon 76 views
  3. Scientists previously thought that frogs and coelacanth are most closely related due to physical characteristics. With DNA
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    2. views icon 71 views
  4. Scientists previously thought that frogs and coelacanth are most closely related due to physical characteristics. With DNA
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    2. ditto asked by ditto
    3. views icon 89 views
  5. Scientists previously thought that frogs and coelacanth are most closely related due to physical characteristics. With DNA
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    2. views icon 63 views
  6. Scientists previously thought that frogs and coelacanth are most closely related due to physical characteristics. With DNA
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    2. views icon 62 views
  7. Scientists classify animals and sort them into groups, such as vertebrates and invertebrates. How do scientists classify frogs?Q
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    2. leslie asked by leslie
    3. views icon 92 views
  8. Scientists classify animals and sort them into groups, such as vertebrates and invertebrates. How do scientists classify frogs?Q
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    2. leslie asked by leslie
    3. views icon 101 views
  9. Passage 1adapted from The Frogs Desiring a King by Aesop The Frogs were living as happy as could be in a marshy swamp that just
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    2. views icon 25 views
  10. How did astronomers' understanding of planets shift by the 16th century?(1 point) Previously, planets were thought to rotate
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    2. views icon 62 views