To determine which statement correctly compares how both industries can benefit water sources in the watershed, we need to consider the roles of both the zoo and the cattle farm concerning water use and waste management.
-
The farm uses the water in the watershed for the cattle to drink. The zoo does not.
- This statement suggests that only the farm may use the water from the watershed directly for its livestock.
-
The farm needs water for growing grass, but the zoo does not.
- This indicates that the farm has agricultural needs that require water, while the zoo may not have such requirements.
-
Both the zoo and the farm get rid of wastes in a manner that does not involve water in the watershed.
- If true, this implies that both industries manage their waste without impacting the water sources, which could be a benefit to the watershed.
-
The wastes from the zoo are safer to add to the water than those from the farm.
- This suggests that waste from the zoo poses less risk to water quality compared to waste from the farm.
Considering these statements, the most accurate response regarding how both industries compare in terms of benefiting the water sources in the watershed would be:
Both the zoo and the farm get rid of wastes in a manner that does not involve water in the watershed.
This statement highlights that both industries can potentially manage their waste in a way that protects water quality, thereby benefiting the watershed.