William T. Sherman's March to Georgia, often viewed as a strategic military campaign during the Civil War, can be deemed unjustified when considering the testimony of witnesses and the profound impact on civilian populations. Accounts from those who lived in the affected areas reveal widespread suffering and destruction; for instance, families were displaced, homes burned, and food supplies confiscated, as described by Southern residents in their poignant narratives. The harsh tactics employed by Sherman, including his policy of "total war," directly contradicted the principles of warfare that promote the protection of civilians. Furthermore, prominent figures of the time, such as Confederate General Joseph E. Johnston, criticized the campaign as inhumane, arguing that it only served to deepen the animosity between North and South without advancing a significant military objective. This evidence illustrates that Sherman's aggressive tactics, rather than leading to a swift conclusion to the conflict, inflicted unnecessary pain on innocent civilians, casting doubt on the justification for his march.
Your verdict must be 1 paragraph in length and must use witness testimony and evidence to support why you believe that William T. Sherman is not Justified for the March to georgia
1 answer