Here’s how I would rate each statement:
-
You ask one of the subject matter experts assigned to your program what they can do to help you improve.
- Rating: BEST
- This response demonstrates a willingness to collaborate and seek guidance from others who have more expertise. It shows initiative to improve by leveraging available resources.
-
You have been hitting your targets most other months so you conclude it's due to external factors and continue doing what you have been doing.
- Rating: WORST
- This response reflects a lack of accountability and an unwillingness to change or adapt. It dismisses the possibility of personal or programmatic improvements and indicates a defeatist attitude.
-
You schedule some time for yourself to focus on reviewing the metrics and resource materials and figure out actions you can take to improve.
- Rating: NEUTRAL
- While this response demonstrates a proactive approach to self-reflection and improvement, it could be considered neutral because it lacks collaboration with others. It is a positive step, but seeking input from colleagues or experts could enhance the process.