Analyzing conflicting information in texts about the same topic requires experienced readers to employ a systematic approach. First, they must carefully read and understand both texts, noting any specific claims or arguments made by each. Then, they should identify the differences and similarities between the two texts, paying attention to the evidence and sources cited. Next, readers should evaluate the credibility and expertise of the authors by researching their backgrounds and credentials. This step helps determine the reliability of the information presented. Additionally, readers should assess the strength of the evidence provided by considering its relevance, accuracy, and objectivity. By comparing the conflicting information in the texts, readers can form an educated opinion on the topic.
Recognizing and evaluating conflicting information is crucial for readers to make informed decisions and avoid being misled or misinformed. By carefully analyzing contrasting viewpoints, readers gain a deeper understanding of the topic and can identify biases or agendas that may be present in the texts. For example, in "The Trouble with Text Speak," the author argues that texting has negatively impacted the English language. However, in "New and Improved (Article Two)," the author asserts that the practice of texting has not harmed our language. By recognizing this conflict, readers can critically assess the arguments presented and consider the evidence provided by both authors before forming their own viewpoint.
In "The Trouble with Text Speak," the author claims that texting has changed the way people write words and compose sentences in certain situations, suggesting a negative impact on the English language. However, in "New and Improved (Article Two)," the author argues against this claim, stating that texting has not harmed our language. These conflicting viewpoints highlight the importance of recognizing and evaluating conflicting information. To form an accurate understanding of the topic, readers must carefully assess these differing arguments, examine the evidence presented in each text, and weigh the credibility of the authors. By doing so, readers can make informed judgments about the impact of texting on language.
Write a paragraph in which you describe the steps that experienced readers can use to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. Explain why it is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information. Provide specific examples from the two texts. The Trouble with Text Speak andNew and Improved (Article Two)
Not so long ago, people communicated with others by talking on the telephone or writing lengthy letters in flowing script. Now, texting or online messaging is the method preferred by many. This practice has changed the way people write words and compose sentences in certain situations, but it has not harmed our language as some suggest.
1 answer
1 answer