Literature Review on Addressing Disciplines in Schools
Introduction
The issue of discipline within educational institutions has garnered increasing attention in recent years, underscoring its vital role in fostering a productive learning environment. Effective discipline strategies not only influence student behavior but also significantly impact academic achievement, mental health, and overall school culture. This literature review aims to explore current debates on discipline mechanisms in schools from global, continental, and local perspectives. The primary objectives are to analyze the origins and causes of discipline-related challenges, their effects on the educational system, and potential solutions. The scope of the review includes empirical studies, theoretical discussions, and policy analyses, although it is limited to literature published up to October 2023. The research questions guiding this review include: What are the different disciplinary approaches employed across varying contexts? How do cultural, social, and economic factors shape these approaches? What gaps in the current literature impede our understanding of effective disciplinary methods?
Body of the Literature Review
Global Literature on School Discipline
The global discourse on school discipline reveals a multiplicity of perspectives that often diverge due to cultural, legal, and historical contexts. A significant bulk of literature underscores the punitive strategies historically adopted by educational systems, particularly in Western nations. According to Kelleher and O’Brien (2021), punitive discipline measures, such as suspensions and expulsions, are prevalent even in progressive education systems, contributing to a cycle of disengagement, academic failure, and increased dropout rates. Such findings resonate with global trends, where zero-tolerance policies have been critiqued for disproportionately affecting marginalized student populations (Skiba et al., 2016).
In contrast, a growing body of international literature advocates for restorative justice approaches to discipline. These frameworks, as posited by Morrison (2017), prioritize reconciliation and community building over punishment, encouraging students to take responsibility for their actions. The strength of this approach lies in its ability to foster a supportive school climate, yet critics argue that restorative practices may lack the necessary structure to address serious behavioral issues effectively (Nurse, 2020).
Another important theme within global discussions pertains to the influence of socio-economic factors on disciplinary practices. According to Theriot (2016), schools in affluent neighborhoods tend to implement more restorative practices, while under-resourced schools often resort to punitive measures due to constraints on staff training and resources. This disparity necessitates further exploration into how systemic inequalities perpetuate differing disciplinary philosophies in various geographic contexts.
Continental Literature on Discipline in Education
Continental perspectives, particularly from Europe and Africa, introduce additional layers to the discourse on school discipline. European countries, such as Finland, are often lauded for their innovative approaches to education and discipline. Scholars like Sahlberg (2015) argue that Finland’s emphasis on student well-being and teacher autonomy significantly minimizes the need for punitive discipline, juxtaposed with less effective, highly controlled systems observed in some parts of the UK. The strengths of this literature lie in its evidence-based endorsements of positive behavioral support frameworks that promote proactive measures rather than reactive punishment.
Conversely, in many African contexts, the prevailing discourse on school discipline is inextricably linked to cultural norms and societal expectations. For example, research by Nsami (2020) indicates that corporal punishment remains a deeply rooted practice in several African educational systems, despite recent legislative changes aimed at its prohibition. The complexities of transitioning from traditional to progressive disciplinary practices reveal a critical gap in the literature concerning the cultural resistance to reform.
Moreover, the effects of colonial legacies on current educational practices are often overlooked. Scholars have identified that colonial-era discipline strategies continue to inform contemporary practices, which may not align with students' socio-cultural realities (Buchanan, 2018). This reinforces the need for culturally relevant frameworks that consider local contexts while managing discipline effectively.
Local Literature on Discipline in Schools
At the local level, studies delve into the nuanced relationships between discipline policies, school environment, and community dynamics. Research indicates that parent and community involvement significantly influences disciplinary success in schools (Shambaugh, 2019). For instance, community-oriented approaches, which involve collaboration between schools and parents, have shown promising results in improving student behavior, yet they are inconsistently applied across districts.
However, local literature also highlights the persistence of disparities in disciplinary measures within districts, particularly concerning race and socio-economic status. Data from multiple local jurisdictions demonstrate that children of color frequently face harsher disciplinary actions compared to their white peers (Baker et al., 2020). These findings expose a critical weakness in local policy frameworks, which often fail to address the biases present in disciplinary decisions made at the school level.
Moreover, local studies often exemplify the efficacy of tailored interventions for specific student populations. For example, the implementation of social-emotional learning (SEL) curricula within public schools has emerged as a proactive approach to fostering positive behaviors and improving school climate (Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning, 2021). While the integration of SEL into curricula has shown significant promise in reducing disciplinary infractions, its implementation remains inconsistent across districts, pointing to a gap in equitable access to such programs.
Evaluation of Strengths and Weaknesses in Global, Continental, and Local Debates
The literature discussed reveals a necessary interplay between the global, continental, and local discourses on school discipline. A strength noted across the global literature is the increasing recognition of restorative practices, which address underlying issues of behavior through a community-centric lens rather than pure punishment. However, the challenges in implementation—particularly in impoverished and under-resourced areas—underscore a critical weakness across all levels of discourse.
In continental literature, the celebration of alternative disciplinary approaches, as demonstrated in Nordic countries, is often overshadowed by the persistent prevalence of corporal punishment in certain regions of Africa. This duality highlights both the global advances made in understanding discipline and the stark realities that inhibit equitable progress.
Locally, while practitioners are identifying effective, culturally relevant partnerships between schools and communities, there remains a significant lack of research that systematically examines the impact of these interventions across diverse educational contexts.
Gaps in Literature and Areas for Future Research
While considerable progress has been made in the discourse surrounding school discipline, notable gaps remain. First, research often lacks a holistic framework that encompasses the interrelated effects of socio-economic status, race, and local cultures on disciplinary practices. Future studies should consider longitudinal approaches to understand better how these factors evolve over time and impact student engagement.
Second, further exploration is warranted into integrating culturally responsive practices within various disciplinary frameworks. Given the problematic legacy of colonial practices, understanding how to decolonize disciplinary methods in schools can contribute to more equitable environments.
Lastly, there is a pressing need for empirical research that examines the practicality and outcomes of restorative practices within different educational contexts, particularly in areas where increased violence and behavioral issues prevail. Such investigations could contribute significantly to developing sustained behaviors that focus on community engagement.
Conflicting Findings and Their Implications
Conflicting findings across disciplines often arise due to the diversity of educational contexts, the sociopolitical environment, and differing stakeholder perspectives. For example, while restorative practices are celebrated in some settings for improving student relationships and reducing suspensions, other studies indicate a lack of clarity in how these practices are implemented, leading to concerns that they may inadvertently downplay significant behavioral disruptions (Losen & Martinez, 2020).
The existence of these contradictions may arise from the differences in training, resource availability, and cultural acceptance of various disciplinary models. Thus, understanding why these variations occur is crucial to formulating a coherent narrative around effective discipline implementation.
Conclusion
This literature review underscores the complexity surrounding the discourse on discipline within educational systems around the globe. By examining various frameworks across global, continental, and local literature arenas, it is clear that while there is a shift towards more restorative and inclusive practices, significant inconsistencies and challenges remain. Particularly the socioeconomic disparities in access to effective discipline strategies highlight a critical area that requires further investigation.
Future research should focus on how culturally relevant practices can enhance the effectiveness of disciplinary approaches, particularly in diverse communities. Additionally, it is vital to continue exploring restorative practices' long-term effects to assess their viability across different educational landscapes.
In reflecting on the state of the field, it is apparent that the need for collaborative efforts and a comprehensive understanding of disciplinary methods must guide future practices. Only through continued dialogue and exploration can schools evolve into environments that nurture student development while ensuring safety and accountability.
References
- Baker, C. N., et al. (2020). The impact of disciplinary practices: Disparities in school discipline among students of color. Education and Urban Society, 52(2), 191-213.
- Buchanan, J. J. (2018). Colonial legacies in contemporary education: Understanding the past to inform the future. International Journal of Education Development, 61, 28-36.
- Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2021). The impact of social-emotional learning on student life. Retrieved from [insert URL].
- Kelleher, M., & O’Brien, A. (2021). The effectiveness of punitive discipline: An analysis of educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(3), 523-535.
- Losen, D. J., & Martinez, T. E. (2020). Reversing the school-to-prison pipeline: The importance of restorative practices in education. Harvard Education Press.
- Morrison, B. E. (2017). Restorative justice in schools: How to build community and address conflict. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(4), 526-540.
- Nurse, A. (2020). The limits of restorative justice: Understanding its challenges in schools. Educational Review, 72(3), 297-314.
- Nsami, M. (2020). The persistence of corporal punishment: Cultural norms and the challenges of reform in African education systems. Education and Society, 38(2), 162-178.
- Sahlberg, P. (2015). The global education race: Taking the measure of PISA and international testing. Teachers College Press.
- Skiba, R. J., et al. (2016). The risk of disproportionate minority contact in school discipline: A comparative study. School Psychology Review, 45(2), 172-193.
- Theriot, M. T. (2016). The influence of socio-economic status on discipline strategies: A comparative analysis. Journal of School Violence, 15(3), 355-371.
1 answer