"Women Fight for the Vote" gives an account of Susan B. Anthony's legal argument for the right to vote. ,begin italics,The Trial of Susan B. Anthony,end italics, gives Anthony's own words on the same topic.



How does Anthony's argument in ,begin italics,The Trial of Susan B. Anthony,end italics, ,begin emphasis,most,end emphasis, clearly ,begin emphasis,differ,end emphasis, in emphasis from "Women Fight for the Vote"?

Answer options with 4 options
1.
Anthony argues that although the government is wrong, women will uphold the rule of law.

2.
Anthony argues that although a battle has been lost, women will continue to fight for the vote.

3.
Anthony argues that without a chance to speak in their defense, women are denied their rights.

4.
Anthony argues that without the fundamental right to vote, women lose all other rights of citizenship.

1 answer

The answer option that most clearly reflects how Anthony's argument in The Trial of Susan B. Anthony differs from "Women Fight for the Vote" is:

4. Anthony argues that without the fundamental right to vote, women lose all other rights of citizenship.

This option highlights a crucial aspect of Anthony's argument, emphasizing the foundational importance of voting rights as integral to other rights of citizenship, which may not be as explicitly articulated in "Women Fight for the Vote."