With such huge increases in population, why has there not been a direct and equivalent increase in urban development (i.e., why is it such a small proportion of habitable land use)?

Question

*
1 point
Many people can live in small spaces, such as high rises in cities.
There is not enough habitable land left for further urban development.
People want to live close to where they work, which is usually the city or suburbs.
Habitable land is already being used for livestock and crops.

Answer 1

There are a few potential answers to this question, but the most likely is that there is simply not enough habitable land left for further urban development. As cities grow and expand, they often spread outwards into surrounding areas, which can lead to issues with land use and declining natural environments. Additionally, many people want to live close to where they work, which often means living in urban or suburban areas. Finally, it's also worth noting that many people can live in small spaces, such as high-rise apartments, which can help to make urban areas more densely populated without requiring as much land.

Answer 2

chooes one chooes

Answer 3

The most likely answer is that there is not enough habitable land left for further urban development.

Answer 4

With such huge increases in population, why has there not been a direct and equivalent increase in urban development (i.e., why is it such a small proportion of habitable land use)?
*
1 point
A. Many people can live in small spaces, such as high rises in cities.
B. There is not enough habitable land left for further urban development.
C. People want to live close to where they work, which is usually the city or suburbs.
D. Habitable land is already being used for livestock and crops.

Answer 5

The answer is B. There is not enough habitable land left for further urban development.