There could be several reasons why the information on this chart may be scrutinized for reliability:
1. Missing data or incomplete comparison: The fact that the United States is not listed for comparison raises questions about the completeness of the data. It is always important to have a comprehensive set of data to draw meaningful comparisons.
2. Discrepancy between literacy rate and GDP per capita: North Korea's high literacy rate does not match its low GDP per capita. This raises doubts about the accuracy or validity of the data for North Korea. It is unusual for a country with high literacy rates to have such a low GDP per capita.
3. Inconsistent relationships: The chart suggests that Hong Kong, with a literacy rate of 94%, has a higher GDP per capita than Taiwan, with a 99% literacy rate. This contradicts the general expectation that higher literacy rates are associated with higher GDP per capita. This inconsistency raises concerns about the reliability of the data for these regions.
Overall, the discrepancies, missing data, and inconsistent relationships within the chart suggest that the information may not be entirely reliable or accurate.
Why would the information on this chart be scrutinized for reliability?
Location- Literacy Rate- GDP per Capita (in current US$)-
North Korea 100% 1,800
Taiwan 99% 46,800
Japan 99% 38,100
South Korea 98% 36,500
Hong Kong 94% 56,700
Indonesia 93% 11,100
India 71% 6,200
The United States is not listed for comparison.
India has a much more developed economy than the numbers indicate.
North Korea's literacy rate is so high yet its GDP per capita is so low.
Because of their Literacy rate, Hong Kong cannot have a higher GDP per Capita than Taiwan.
(pick one answer)
1 answer